SCOTLAND could easily achieve its ambitious green energy targets – but only at a cost to the environment, a conservation charity will tell MSPs.
The claim will be made by the John Muir Trust (JMT) at a parliamentary inquiry, due to open today, into the Scottish Government's goal of generating the equivalent of 100% of Scotland's own electricity demand from renewable sources by 2020.
One of the first to give evidence to Holyrood's Economy, Energy and Tourism Committee will be Helen McDade, policy officer for the land charity.
Its submission says: "Achieving the renewables target primarily with industrial-scale wind generation would be a Pyrrhic victory – due to the cost to the environment, the economy and local communities, and the lack of substantial contribution to the greenhouse gas emissions reduction (GHG) targets."
The JMT argues that if the 2020 renewable target is achieved primarily by wind-generated electricity, as is currently assumed, the consequences for the natural environment landscapes will be severe. It claims these changes will have a negative impact on tourism.
The JMT believes that an independent National Energy Commission is urgently needed to assess the technical and economic aspects of current Scottish and UK policy.
It also insists that the most effective way for public money to contribute to reduced GHG emissions within the UK is for tax or subsidies, which are levied as a contribution to energy and GHG emissions reductions measures, to be spent primarily on energy conservation.
Meanwhile, Scottish Natural Heritage has published new guidance to help wind farm development. It aims to help local authority planners and developers ensure developments are located in the right places.
l Atmos Consulting is claiming planning success for the Shiels wind farm in Aberdeenshire on behalf of Polar Energy. Three 100m turbines, by Laurencekirk, will power 4000 homes. Both Atmos and Aberdeenshire councillors have called for more planning guidance on large-scale wind farm developments.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article