ONE of Scotland's largest councils is to clamp down on dog ownership in blocks of flats after five people were injured by the same animal in one stairwell.
Edinburgh City Council is to consider tougher action against people who flout dog bans after the alleged incident at Cables Wynd House in Leith last year.
The dog was thought to have been a cross between an American Pitbull – a breed banned under Dangerous Dogs Act – and a Staffordshire Terrier. It has since been put down.
It is understood a broad change of policy would also affect people who own dogs in other multi-occupancy blocks such as tenements, and the move could also set a precedent that could be adopted by other councils.
Initially the local authority plans a "pet ownership" scheme that would remind residents with dogs of their responsibilities but also help identify and remove animals banned under the Dangerous Dogs Act that are being kept illegally.
The Herald understands a report is now to be considered by a sub- committee responsible for safety in multistorey flats before options are finalised.
Mark Turley, director of Services for Communities, said the council's tenancy agreement in relation to keeping dogs does prohibit the keeping of dogs in multistorey blocks, but few take notice of the rules.
Mr Turley said: "Inevitably this does not prevent tenants from choosing to have dogs in their homes. Reported nuisance or disturbance in relation to dogs are investigated by the multistorey block managers and community safety staff within the local neighbourhood teams.
"The course of action taken will be dependent on the individual circumstances in each case and the extent of any nuisance being caused. Normally, a change of behaviour will be sought from irresponsible owners to ensure dogs are managed in a responsible way. In the case of Cables Wynd House, no previous nuisance was reported.
"Taking legal action to enforce a prohibitive tenancy condition, including the clause on not keeping dogs, is difficult and can be a lengthy legal process."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article