A multi-million pound project that would have led to radioactive waste being buried along the North Ayrshire coastline has been abandoned in the face of protests by local residents and environmentalists.
Investigations into a £3.2 million plan to bury large amounts of radioactive graphite underground at Hunterston have been suspended by the UK Government's Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA). The area is said to be vulnerable to coastal erosion. Now the graphite waste will be stored in a huge engineered storage facility recently built at Hunterston.
Critics had also feared that burying the graphite would free up space in the storage facility for waste from other nuclear sites across the country. They have welcomed the decision to drop the graphite burial project.
"I'm glad the radioactive waste will be going to the store where it is retrievable," said Rita Holmes, who represents Fairlie Community Council on Hunterston's stakeholder group.
The graphite comes from two old reactors which are being dismantled at Hunterston. On an adjacent site there are two reactors that are still generating electricity for consumers.
The NDA's spokesman, Bill Hamilton, stressed that it had been a good project, and it had shown that an underground store was feasible. But the risks of delays and rising costs forced its suspension.
Pete Roche, a nuclear consultant in Edinburgh, described as "misconceived" the idea that nuclear waste could somehow be safely disposed of underground. "Radioactive substances will eventually leak out – we can't wish them away," he said.
He pointed out that Sepa had warned of the potential dangers of coastal erosion and rising sea levels at the site due to global warming.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article