A cash-strapped local authority is under fire over plans to spend around £15,000 on a lavish painting of the city's lord provost.
Glasgow City Council, which is having to make savings of around £42 million in the next financial year, has commissioned the portrait from an artist used by royalty and the Tory Party.
The decision comes in spite of the council in Edinburgh reversing a plan to fund a painting of its own provost.
The Labour administration in Glasgow has in recent years made a series of tough decisions to reduce spending.
Nearly 2000 employees have left their posts as part of the council spending around £32.7m on voluntary early retirement deals.
A chunk of next year's cuts will be found from not replacing departing staff – a move that could impact on service quality.
However, the council's priorities have again been questioned after it emerged that scarce resources were to be spent honouring its Lord Provost, Labour's Bob Winter.
When cash is not in short supply, the city council generally commissions a painting of its outgoing civic figurehead.
When hard times fall, officials opt for the cheaper option of a photograph.
Councillors and trades unionists are enraged that, in the middle of a global economic downturn, Glasgow has sanctioned the more lavish option for Winter.
Officials have picked Scots artist Anne Mackintosh to produce a framed portrait of Winter.
Mackintosh's previous commissions include Baroness Thatcher, John Major and current Prime Minister David Cameron.
She has a hand-written thank you note from Thatcher, while she was quoted saying of Cameron: "I told him he had wonderful skin."
She has also painted former Tory Scottish Secretaries Ian Lang, Michael Forsyth and Sir Malcolm Rifkind. Other subjects have included the Duchess of York, HM King Hussein of Jordan and various members of the aristocracy. She also painted the late Donald Dewar and John Smith.
In 2001, it was reported that Mackintosh charged around £15,000 for a full-length picture.
Of the last seven provosts, three have settled for photographs instead of paintings.
The cost to the taxpayer of commissioning a painting of Winter's predecessor, Liz Cameron, was £17,000.
A council spokeswoman said Mackintosh had asked for the cost of the painting not to be disclosed due to "commercial confidentiality".
The portrait has already been completed.
The decision to give Winter a grand send-off comes after the council in Edinburgh shelved plans to spend £30,000 on artworks of the current lord provost and his predecessor. Officials had been set to spend £15,000 on a painting of incumbent George Grubb and the same amount on a stained-glass window of former provost, Lesley Hinds.
A Glasgow City Council spokeswoman said: "Since the early 19th century, the council has commissioned portraits of out-going lord provosts.
"They are part of the city's art collection and are hung in public view in the City Chambers portrait gallery.
"In the case of Lord Provost Bob Winter, Anne Mackintosh was commissioned to produce a framed portrait."
David Meikle, the city's only Tory councillor, said it was extraordinary that the council "thinks it appropriate to spend this much on a painting when the council is facing cutbacks and some of his predecessors settled for a photograph. The Labour administration should stop wasting public money and provide leadership".
Martin Doran, an organiser at the GMB trade union, said: "This sort of spending is galling and beggars belief. Staff will be shaking their heads in disbelief at the callousness of such a decision."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article