ALEX Salmond's vision of an independent Scotland attracting global investors with ultra-low corporation tax has been dismissed as "a fantasy" by one of his former economic advisers.
Professor John Kay, who served on the First Minister's Council of Economic Advisers during the last Parliament, said the idea was a "non-starter" because the rest of the EU would block it.
Salmond and his Finance Secretary John Swinney called last year for corporation tax to be controlled from Edinburgh, citing the example of Ireland's 12.5% rate, which has created jobs by helping attract international firms like Google.
The idea is backed by two of Scotland's richest entrepreneurs, Sir Tom Hunter and the engineering tycoon Jim McColl, who have called for the current UK rate of 25% to be slashed to between 12.5% and 15% north of the Border to boost the economy.
The ability of an independent Scotland to cut corporation tax is one of the SNP's big economic ideas in the run-up to the 2014 referendum.
However, Kay said a low rate was incompatible with the SNP's plan for an independent Scotland also being a full member of the EU.
He said it was inconceivable that other EU states, who want to end Ireland's 12.5% rate and who are now moving towards common tax rates, would allow Scotland to copy Ireland's example.
"No-one is going to allow Scotland to have a low corporation tax. That's just a fantasy," he said. "If Scotland's an independent country, the EU will not allow it. It's a non-starter. What has happened on corporation tax is Ireland has this low rate and everyone around the EU is determined that that should never happen again.
"So Scotland would have to negotiate EU membership – it wouldn't be difficult, everyone's going to have Scotland as a member – but you can be absolutely sure that one of the conditions is that you don't have a 12.5% corporation tax rate.
"Since a fuss has been made in Scotland about doing that, it would be inevitable that you would get the determination on the part of the Europeans that you do not have it."
In August, the SNP Government issued a discussion paper on reforming corporation tax, which repeatedly referred to Ireland's 12.5% rate and the investment it attracted, saying it could create 58,000 jobs if copied in Northern Ireland.
In a speech to the Northern Ireland Assembly at Stormont in 2008, Salmond also referred to the 12.5% rate, saying "Scotland's government believes very strongly that, with measures such as low competitive tax, we can match or even exceed" the success in Ireland and the other countries in the now infamous "arc of prosperity".
However, France, which has long complained about Ireland's 12.5% tax rate, and Germany are currently pushing for more tax harmonisation as part of the measures to stabilise the Eurozone.
Opposition parties last night said the SNP's independence plans didn't stand up to scrutiny.
Labour finance spokesman Ken Macintosh said: "Alex Salmond's economic policies are disintegrating in front of our eyes. Now one of Britain's leading economists and his former adviser is telling him what he should already know: his plans to cut corporation tax, maintain public spending and remain a member of the EU are incompatible."
LibDem leader Willie Rennie said: "The SNP will need to do better if they are going to convince people to take the risk of independence. Making false promises over tax will shake business confidence and call into question other assurances the SNP has given over the economy."
David McLetchie, the Tories' constitution spokesman, added: "There is no way that the EU is going to permit an independent Scotland to have a low corporation tax rate. As on so many other things Alex Salmond will be told what to do by the French and the Germans and will meekly comply."
A spokesman for Swinney said: "There are varying rates of corporation tax across the EU and each state is free to set their rates, as long as they do not discriminate against other businesses. Lower corporation tax will give Scotland a competitive edge. The opposition parties are as confused and incoherent as usual."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article