THE BBC must ensure there are more women presenters and executives on its radio network if it is to justify its licence fee, an MP said after she found that in some cases there were fewer female voices than 25 years ago.
Liberal Democrat MP Tessa Munt discovered that on Radio 2 there were no women with children above the low-ranking assistant producer level, while on Radio 1 only 15% of DJs were female, compared to 16% in 1987.
She said efforts by the corporation to tackle the issue, which include "further mentoring, further training and succession planning" were patronising as men would not be subject to such scrutiny.
Ms Munt, MP for Wells, said: "The problem is so significant because when you look at the amount of taxpayers' money used to support the BBC, it is millions and millions and millions.
"Gender shouldn't make a blind bit of difference on the radio because how you look is utterly irrelevant. The balance between men and women is actually a systemic problem because exactly the same happens on the radio as it does on television.
"Radio presenters are in one of the most influential media because a lot of young people do not necessarily read the papers. They are hugely influential."
Her comments come after the BBC has faced accusations of ageism, particularly against women, following a series of high-profile departures.
Countryfile presenter Miriam O'Reilly won an age discrimination case against the corporation last year and former newsreader Selina Scott accused the BBC of ageism and sexism for employing too few older female newsreaders.
But earlier this week broadcaster Kirsty Young said: "I don't see why I shouldn't be doing Desert Island Discs until I'm 85."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article