A legal action brought by two Catholic midwives after they claimed to have been forced to supervise abortions against their religious beliefs has been described as a landmark case.
Senior counsel for NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board (NHSGGC) in the judicial review at the Court of Session said it was likely to affect the determination of "many other cases likely to arise in the future".
Midwifery sisters Mary Doogan, 57, and Concepta Wood, 51, are seeking a finding that that their entitlement to conscientious objection "to participation in treatment for termination of pregnancy and feticide" under abortion legislation includes the right to refuse to delegate, supervise and support staff in the work.
Their lawyers said they hold a religious belief that all human life is sacred from the moment of conception and termination of pregnancy is a grave offence against human life.
They said they believe their involvement in the termination process is wrongful and an offence against God and renders them accomplices to a grave offence.
Ms Doogan, from Garrowhill, Glasgow, and Ms Wood, from Clarkston, East Renfrewshire, work as labour ward coordinators at Glasgow's Southern General Hospital.
They maintain in their action that the sanction for their involvement in the process, including its facilitation, is automatic excommunication from the Catholic Church.
Brian Napier QC, for NHSGGC, said: "Although this case is about the particular circumstances of the petitioners and their complaints at the Southern General the outcome is likely to have general importance for other hospitals not just in Scotland, but throughout the UK."
He said that since the issue was a matter of statutory interpretation of legislation the outcome was likely to effect many cases that could come up in future.
Mr Napier, who will give a ruling at a later date, said NHSGGC accepted that the action related "to a question of public importance".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article