SCOTTISH councils fear Government welfare reforms will cost the country's economy up to £600 million, put as many as 14,000 jobs at risk and hurt the most vulnerable families.
The Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (Cosla) will this week publish analysis from councils and academics which it says shows the reforms being introduced by Westminster will have a devastating impact on Scotland.
Brought in at a time when the financial crisis means demand for services is rising because of unemployment and pressure on household budgets, the benefit changes will jeopardise councils' ability to respond, they say.
Cosla has been in talks with the UK Government about a number of changes to welfare including housing benefit cuts, reforms to disability benefits and the launch of a new Universal Credit to replace existing support. However, while acknowledging the system is currently too complicated, Scotland's councils say they are angry they have been unable to get answers to key questions about how the new systems will work.
Harry McGuigan, Cosla's spokesman for community, wellbeing and safety, told The Herald the Government's plans were ill-thought through and while ministers had a firm grasp of how much money the changes would save, they had little knowledge of their impact. He said: "They know very well the incomes that will derive from it, but seem to be completely blind about the consequences. The consultation has been very poor about this. Local authorities are asking questions, but not getting any answers at all. We want to see improvements, but you don't improve the system by heaping pain on the most vulnerable in society."
The figure of a £600m cost to the economy came from a study carried out by Rights Advice Scotland and the Scottish Local Government Forum Against Poverty. Mr McGuigan said recent analysis of welfare reform by individual councils backs up the fears.
Reforms to Disability Living Allowance will cut 20% from the amount paid out, the Government says. Glasgow City Council has calculated this will mean disabled people who are currently charged for services will no longer be able to pay, but will still need the support, costing the city an additional £50m.
Under housing benefit reforms, the benefit will be paid direct to individuals, not to landlords as is currently the case. At present housing benefit pays out £500m a year in Scotland, but councils are concerned the change runs the risk of some tenants being unable to manage the funds and falling into arrears. Local authorities expect to "lose" 10% of housing benefit income this way, costing £50m.
"We could see evictions rise," said Mr McGuigan, "and the 2012 commitment to end homelessness – a Scottish policy – will not be met. The cumulative effect will be to send households spiralling into debt and facing homelessness.".
Cosla says the scale and the pace of welfare reform is also a major problem, with a lack of detail over crucial details. Councils have been seeking clarification over a series of issues about how the changes will be implemented, but much detail is still unknown.
A Department for Work and Pensions spokeswoman said: "Our welfare reforms will make work pay and end the cycle of generations trapped in a life on benefits. Latest figures show one in five Scottish households is workless and in Glasgow that figure is as high as one in three. The Universal Credit will lift almost one million people in the UK out of poverty.
"We will of course continue to work closely with the Scottish Government on the reforms."
Earlier research suggests every £10.795m raised in extra benefits supports the creation of 250 jobs across Scotland.
The Scottish Local Government Forum Against Poverty said this meant that if hundreds of millions of pounds of benefits are removed and lost from the purchasing power of individuals in Scotland, this would directly jeopardise around 14,000 jobs.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article