AN OPENLY gay ally of David Cameron has emerged as a serious contender to become the next leader of the Scottish Conservatives.
Ruth Davidson, a former BBC reporter who was only elected as a Glasgow list MSP eight weeks ago, is being urged to stand by senior figures at both Westminster and Holyrood.
The 32-year-old is understood to have the backing of current leader Annabel Goldie and allies of the Prime Minister, who see her as a moderate alternative to the other main contender, the right-wing deputy leader Murdo Fraser.
Leadership nominations are due to open in September with the new leader installed in early November.
In the run up to the Scottish election, Davidson worked as an aide to Goldie, and was not expected to become an MSP. However, the resignation of the leading Tory candidate in Glasgow over past financial problems propelled her to the top of the regional list, and she was elected with 6% of the vote.
After Goldie announced she would step down in the autumn, Davidson downplayed suggestions she might stand as her successor. Instead, she backed Tory justice spokesman John Lamont for the leadership. But Lamont self-destructed last month with a controversial speech on Catholic schools.
Although on the right of his party, Fraser, 45, is regarded with suspicion by Unionists because of his support for far greater tax and spending powers for the Scottish Parliament.
The only other likely contender is fellow right-winger Jackson Carlaw, 52, but his recent failure to win the Eastwood seat despite boundary changes giving him a 3,500-vote lead has damaged his chances.
Davidson is close to Cameron, and accompanied the Prime Minister when he visited Glasgow during the Scottish elections.
The only openly gay Tory MSP, she lives in Edinburgh with her partner of three years, an analyst for RBS.
“It is basically Annabel’s supporters within the group who are urging Ruth to go for it. It’s Annabel’s wish.”
Davidson said: “I have made no decision to stand. In fact, I don’t believe any of my parliamentary colleagues have declared whether they’re going to stand or not.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article