THE chairman of the British Medical Association's Scottish Consultants Committee, Dr Lewis Morrison expresses concern about the centralisation of some hospital services, though it is unfortunate that genuine concerns by patients should be interpreted as their "wanting homeopathy on every street corner" ("SNP's pledge to keep NHS local is dishonest'", The Herald, June 20).
The Scottish Health Campaigns Network came into being as a direct result of the concerns felt by communities over plans by health boards to reduce local services. Planned closure of Accident and Emergency units in Fort William, Monklands and Ayr were eventually rescinded. Similarly, the proposal to close in-patient beds at the Glasgow Homeopathic Hospital, the only homeopathic hospital in the UK to offer such an amenity, were abandoned in the face of opposition by patients who had benefited from the provision of this service as was the proposed loss of the consultant led maternity unit in Caithness.
Although many communities feared the loss of local services, it was recognised that centralisation of specialised treatment, such as head injuries, heart and lung transplants, and neurological damage produced better outcomes.
Time spent by patients in hospital is progressively being reduced as a result of less invasive surgery and changes in medical treatment access by relatives is very important to patients and is one factor which contributes to recovery.
As part of a pilot exercise, members of health boards have been elected by the public to serve on NHS boards in Fife and in Dumfries and Galloway. It is to be hoped that this will lead to members of the public having a greater input into the decisions made by health boards and will introduce greater transparency into the proceedings.
The Scottish Health Campaigns Network will continue to represent those who fear a diminution of patient care in the face of financial cutbacks.
Malcolm Allan,
Secretary, Scottish Health Campaigns Network, 2 Tofthill Gardens, Bishopbriggs, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article