Anxiety was turning to despair last night for the family of Madeleine McCann as Portuguese police admitted they could give "no firm assurance" the three-year-old was still alive.
Five days after her disappearance from her parents' holiday apartment in the Algarve resort of Praia da Luz, the police announced that Interpol and Europol were now assisting the investigation.
They had said on Saturday that they believed she was both alive and still in Portugal.
But last night Chief Inspector Olegario Sousa of the Central Directorate for the Fight Against Crime (DCCB), Portugal's equivalent of the National Crime Squad, was unable to provide that assurance.
While he insisted all efforts were being made to recover Madeleine, when asked how confident he was she was still alive, he said: "It is very difficult to give you an answer because I have not facts to sustain that the child is alive or not.
"We're searching for the child and until the moment she appears we can say nothing more because we are not magicians.
"All the authorities involved are doing the best efforts to recover the child."
At a chaotic press conference in the Town of Portimao the chief inspector said he could say little about the investigation because of restrictions of Portuguese law.
Earlier, speaking from the resort, Kate and Gerry McCann made an anguished plea to whoever had their daughter not to harm her, and to set her free.
"Please do not scare her, please let us know where to find Madeleine or put her in place of safety and tell somebody where," he mother said. "We beg you to let Madeleine come home."
She added: "Please give our little girl back," repeating it in Portuguese: "Por favor, devolva a nossa menina."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article