It all started with a Women's Institute exhibition and a few yards of linen. One bright idea and a few headscarves later, the Laura Ashley brand was born.
Inspired by some Victorian prints she had seen at a WI craft exhibition, Ashley decided to start up her own print-making business in 1953. Instantly spotting a gap in the market, she chose to recreate vintage patterns and produce a range of scarves, table mats and napkins.
The products were an instant hit with department stores such as John Lewis and Heal's, making Ashley, along with her husband and business partner Sir Bernard Ashley, one of the biggest success stories in British retail history.
Although Laura died in 1985 after falling down some stairs on her 60th birthday, her original designs are back in the public eye. The current design team behind the brand has announced it would be raiding the archives and reproducing some of Ashley's most successful pieces.
Among them is an original 1960s quilted bag, a youthful patchwork string bikini and Ashley's trademark daisy-print shirt. While the company has been faithful to Ashley's original designs, a small compromise has been made for all those environmentally conscious modern women: everything is to be made from 100% organic cotton.
It's all a far cry from the kitchen table-top business that won the hearts, and purse strings, of the British nation in the 1950s. Back then the Ashleys were focused on producing design-conscious products that would appeal to fashionable-but-homely women.
After the headscarves came aprons, oven gloves and gardening smocks, all made with those trademark Laura Ashley printed fabrics. As the company quickly grew, the couple moved production to Kent and then on to Wales, where Laura had been born.
From the beginning, Laura was in charge of fabric design, while Bernard took control of the production and operation sides of the business.
When Bernard developed a new printing system that could produce 5000m of fabric in a week, sales went into overdrive. By 1970 sales had reached £300,000 per year and by 1974 Laura Ashley had stores in Australia, Canada, Japan and Paris - the first store to be given the characteristic racing green frontage and wood-panelled interior.
By this time the brand had also managed firmly to establish itself on the fashion radar. Indeed, when a newspaper suggested that wearing a Laura Ashley frock would make any woman look as beautiful as Katharine Ross in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, the company's London store was inundated with requests.
The introduction of Laura Ashley homewear also proved successful. Floral prints and classic designs were merged together to create an attractive package, which sat comfortably with the back-to-basics, good-life movement that was happening at the time.
Two months after Laura died the company went public and found itself 34 times over-subscribed on the stock market.
From that business high point, however, things started to go downhill. Without Laura's directional eye, and thanks to changing tastes in fashion, shoppers slowly started to fall out of love with the brand. By 2005 the company was forced to close its flagship Regent Street store.
Nevertheless, Laura Ashley has retained a following over the years and only last month the company's majority owner, Malaysian billionaire K P Khoo, announced pre-tax profits of £12.2m and an increase in UK sales of 10.3%.
However, whether Laura's original designs will impress women enough a second time round to haul the brand back into fashion, remains to be seen.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article