War on Want, the international anti-poverty charity, yesterday urged the government to regulate British mercenary companies in an attempt to curb alleged human rights abuses against civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Ruth Tanner, the organisation's campaigns officer, told a special meeting in Edinburgh that MPs in the UK had failed to control the controversial private security firm market, despite publication almost six years ago of a green paper outlining possible legal restraints.
"Mounting human rights abuses by mercenary firms making a financial killing from the conflicts are fuelling demands for legislation. But while even the US and Iraqi governments move towards controls, UK ministers take no action," she said.
"It is high time Britain stopped stalling and followed suit with strong measures to rein in these private armies."
The "Big Six" UK companies in the field are Edinburgh Risk Security Management, Control Risks Group, ArmorGroup, the Kroll Security Group, Erinys Iraq and Aegis Defence Services.
Iraq has revitalised the mercenary profession since 2003 and turned it into a multi-billion pound global industry.
UK private security firms saw profits increase from £320m five years ago to £1.8bn in 2004.
The UK government has, meanwhile, spent £179m on private contracts in Iraq between 2003 and 2008 and another £46m in Afghanistan.
At least 44 British private security employees have been killed so far.
The estimated 21,000 British mercenaries operating in Iraq outnumber British service personnel by four to one.
War on Want says guards from British firms ArmorGroup - chaired by Sir Malcolm Rifkind - and Aegis have been involved in shootings.
Mercenaries working for Erinys wounded three Iraqis near the northern city of Kirkuk in October last year, while Aegis employees were shown in an internet video apparently firing randomly at passing civilian traffic during a convoy run to Baghdad airport.
There are 17 UK-run mercenary firms in Afghanistan among the 60 private companies operating there.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article