THE reclusive owner of the Timex Corporation, Norwegian Fred Olsen,
last night broke his silence about the bitter dispute in Dundee --
calling on workers who yesterday rejected the company's back-to-work
proposals to ''go home and think again''.
Mr Olsen, who had been visiting the Dundee plant to be briefed on
latest developments, said that the Amalgamated Engineering and
Electrical Union had ''a bit more selling to do'' with the proposals.
''We've made a deal with the union, it's up to them,'' he said.
Meanwhile, the sacked Timex workers are ready to escalate their
campaign in an effort to get their jobs back.
They took only 30 minutes to reject unanimously the company offer
aimed at settling the dispute, many later describing the package as
insulting and humiliating.
Timex president Peter Hall said at the plant that he was disappointed
by the decision. He believed the company was making a significant step
towards ending a bitter conflict. He said the ball was now firmly in the
union court.
Mr Olsen claimed that the Dundee factory had been loss-making for 10
years and that to achieve ''a positive bottom line'' the company had
tried to replace watches with other products such as the Sinclair
Computer and the 3-D camera to keep the factory open.
''We failed in many of them. We now seemed to have built up a niche
making electronic boards for other people.''
Mr Olsen said that the company would not leave Dundee and that it
would honour its current workforce. He added: ''We have good people here
who are really pitching in and they are willing to do all jobs.''
He also dismissed speculation that Mr Hall might be replaced. ''There
will be no change,'' he said.
Yesterday's rejection left the STUC in a difficult position as it had
believed that a formula allowing a return to work might have been
achieved.
The STUC said later that it fully understood the defiance of the
workers, and would seek talks with the union to discuss how the campaign
should now move forward at home and abroad.
Assistant secretary of the STUC Richard Leonard said it had hoped that
after months of intransigence by Timex management, talks could have
resulted in an offer acceptable to the sacked workers.
Details of the company's proposals were outlined to the 343 workers
who have been picketing the plant for 18 weeks by Mr Jimmy Airlie, a
member of the AEEU's executive council.
At a news conference later, he explained that in the talks with Timex,
the company had stated its final position, which was to adopt a
world-class manufacturing capacity in Dundee, and introduce the changes
involved in such a concept.
Mr Airlie said: ''I made it clear that as a union we were for
world-class manufacturing -- but you can't have world-class
manufacturing on third world wages.''
Later, he described the company's measures as draconian and said it
would mean a wage cut of 27% for some workers, a two-year wage freeze,
loss of
bonus, and assessment of their ability by Timex.
''We recognised that our members would be deeply hostile to cuts in
their benefits and wages,'' he said. ''Our members are determined to
continue the dispute and are making it clear that they will go as long
as necessary.
''This dispute will not go away unless there is ultimately a
negotiated settlement.''
Mr Airlie admitted the company and the union were now in an entrenched
position.
There was a tremendous gap between the company's demands, and what his
members were prepared to accept.
Convener of shop stewards John Kidd added later that the workers would
take their case to the US, Denmark and Germany, where companies dealing
with Timex would be approached in an effort to continue the call for a
boycott of its products.
''There is a new level of anger as a result of this offer, and this
will be channelled into bringing new pressure on the company,'' he said.
Vice-convener Charlie Malone described the package as ''the worst kind
of insult'' and said the attitude of the sacked workers had hardened.
Heavy picketing at the plant is expected again next Monday, and a
demonstration is being planed in Dundee on June 19.
The SNP said last night it fully supported the workers, calling for a
boycott of Timex products.
Labour's Scottish Affairs spokesman Henry McLeish, described the
company package as a ''sweatshop offer'' and called for an early
resolution to the dispute.
Mr Hall denied that the deal put to the workers was insulting and said
the conditions offered were identical to those which exist within Timex
today.
If the sacked workers had returned, they would have been offered the
same pay as new employees at the plant.
He said the company recognised the realities of the bitterness of the
conflict and made provision for redundancy payments for those sacked
workers who did not wish to return.
Mr Hall said Timex had been in Dundee for almost half a
century and ''we have no intention of being driven off by a vast
number of Militant supporters.''
POLICE made several arrests in Dundee last night after a policeman and
a female picket were knocked down and injured near the Timex factory.
The officer and the woman were taken to Dundee Royal Infirmary and
released after treatment for bruising.
A police spokesman said occupants of a vehicle had been arrested and a
report was being sent to the procurator-fiscal.
The offer
THE package offered by Timex and accepted by the alternative workforce
of about 290 hourlypaid employees entailed:
A twoyear wage freeze.
A reduction in company contributions to the pension scheme.
Scrapping payment of a bonus of one week's wages.
Lower sick pay and longer qualifying periods for sick pay.
Ending canteen subsidies, which would mean some meal prices doubling.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article