UNION leaders involved in the Timex dispute in Dundee said last night
that the company plans to close the plant by Christmas.
Emerging from two hours of talks in a city hotel, senior company
official Mr Mohammed Saleh, announced that talks would continue today,
adding: ''We are always hopeful.''
Local union officials of the AEEU, however, were more pessimistic.
The deputy vice-convener of shop stewards, Mr William Lesslie, said
the company had warned emphatically that even if the last package on
offer was accepted, there was a 90% likelihood of closure by Christmas.
Convener of shop stewards, Mr John Kydd, said various options were put
by the company to the union but, at this stage, were unacceptable.
He claimed that they had been informed that if the last deal offered
was not acceptable, the plant would close, adding that there seemed to
be nothing fresh from Timex.
He said it was hoped that some of the points made by the union would
be considered by Mr Saleh and that he would see some sense and change
his opinion.
Mr Kydd added: ''We were prepared to compromise but we are still poles
apart.''
There had been jubilation earlier on the picket line when it was
confirmed that Mr Peter Hall, president of the Dundee plant -- appointed
two years ago with a salary of #72,000 -- had resigned his post.
It had been thought that a huge obstacle to a settlement had been
removed with his resignation.
Mr Gavin Laird, AEEU general secretary, said the resignation of Mr
Hall had come as a surprise and added: ''I am extremely pessimistic
about the plant's future.'' He suggested that it would require
''something of a miracle'' if closure was to be avoided.
Yesterday's talks followed intense activity at boardroom level after
Mr Hall resigned. He had been the central figure in what began as a
routine dispute over lay-offs and escalated into the dismissal of 340
workers and their replacement by new recruits bussed in daily past
jeering demonstrators.
Details of Mr Hall's resignation were given to present staff and
workers, who number almost 400, by Mr John Dryfe, the American-based
president of the parent company.
Pickets outside the plant cheered the news and celebrated by burning
placards demanding Mr Hall's resignation.
However, Mr Hall, 41, was in a near jaunty mood last night outside his
#300,000 Surrey family home in Godalming, in the heart of London's
stockbroker belt. There was clear relief that a burden had been lifted
from his shoulders.
He said the recent events had been a nightmare for his family. He was
adamant that the final decision to go had been his and his alone --
despite inevitable speculation that followed when his international
bosses became intimately involved in the negotiations last week.
For six months, the Timex workers had been demanding his resignation.
It came on Sunday night and was made public only yesterday.
Asked if he had been made the scapegoat, Mr Hall replied: ''I hope not
but you will have to ask Timex that -- it is their problem now.''
Was there a future for the factory? ''That, too, is a matter for
Timex,'' he declared.
The company confirmed the news in a brief statement, saying it
regretted to announce Mr Hall's resignation from his post as a president
of the corporation and a director.
The strike, which has seen huge rallies and arrests on the picket
line, has entered its twenty-first week.
A ''final offer'' was made to the sacked workers following the arrival
in Dundee of Norwegian Mr Fred Olsen, the Timex chairman, who intervened
personally.
It was rejected amid allegations that it effectively meant a 27% cut
in wages, a two-year pay freeze, and would affect pension entitlement.
The SNP, Labour, and the STUC criticised the Timex stance, and called
for fresh negotiations.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article