MORE than half of Labour's 62 Euro-MPs have joined the growing
rebellion against leader Tony Blair's plans to rewrite Clause Four of
the party's constitution.
They placed a front-page advertisement in today's Guardian attacking
any revision of the 56 words which have been the party's guiding
principle since 1918, committing Labour to ''common ownership of the
means of production, distribution and exchange''. Among the signatories
are Strathclyde West's Hugh McMahon and Alex Smith, of South of
Scotland.
The move, adding to the pressure on Mr Blair over his radical bid to
modernise the party, comes on the day he makes his European debut in
Brussels as party leader.
A total of 32 MEPs have signed a statement demanding the retention of
Clause Four.
Alex Falconer, MEP for Mid Scotland and Fife, said: ''Just over half
of the British Labour MEPs are behind this advertisement, but many more
are unhappy with the way this whole thing has been handled over Clause
Four.''
He went on: ''With Britain and the rest of the world in crisis, this
is no time to jettison this powerful weapon for social and economic
justice.
''We oppose privatisation and believe that common ownership should
remain part of Labour's core beliefs and values. That is why we have
called for the retention of Clause Four part four in its present form,
and for a separate statement to express the party's aims today.''
The appearance of the advertisement will mar Mr Blair's emergence on
the European stage at a #500-a-head dinner in Brussels being hosted by
Labour and attended by senior executives from nearly 100 leading
companies, including Marks and Spencer, NatWest Bank, Coca Cola and
Hanson.
Mr Blair will join them after a half-day conference designed to
''establish close working links and a constructive dialogue between
business and the Labour party at a European level'' according to Wayne
David, leader of Labour's Euro-MPs.
At the same time, former Labour leader Neil Kinnock will be
establishing his credentials in Brussels as a new Euro Commissioner.
It is his turn tomorrow to be grilled by MEPs who are vetting all
incoming Commissioners before they take up their #130,000-a-year posts
later this month.
Meanwhile, at Labour's business conference, any profits made will go
to the party's fighting fund for the next general election.
Mr David said the topics on tomorrow's agenda will include economic
policy, environment and consumer protection, social affairs and trade.
''This event will show Labour working in the heart of Europe,'' he
said.
Mr David was not asked to join the Euro-Labour revolt against Clause
Four, to avoid compromising the group leader in Europe.
The full list of signatories is:
Richard Balfe (London South Inner); David Bowe (Cleveland and
Richmond); Roger Barton (Sheffield); Ken Coates (North Nottingham and
Chesterfield); Peter Crampton (Humberside); Alan Donnelly (Tyne and
Wear); Mike Elliott (London West); Robert Evans (London North West);
Alex Falconer; David Hallam (Hereford and Shrophire); Mike Hindley
(Lancashire South);
Stephen Hughes (Durham and Blaydon); Hugh Kerr (Essex West and
Hertfordshire East); Alf Lomas (London North East); Mike McGowan
(Leeds); Hugh McMahon; Eryl McNally (Bedfordshire and Milton Keynes);
Tom Megahy (Yorkshire South West); David Morris (South Wales West);
Clive Needle (Norfolk); Stan Newens (London Central); Eddy Newman
(Greater Manchester Central); Chris Oddy (Coventry and North
Warwickshire); Barry Seal (Yorkshire West); Alex Smith;
Shaun Spiers (London South East); Ken Stewart (Merseyside West): David
Thomas (Suffolk and South-west Norfolk); Sue Waddington (Leicester);
Norman West (Yorkshire South); Ian White (Bristol); Joe Wilson (North
Wales).
Shadow foreign secretary Robin Cook said that the move by the MEPs was
''very unfortunate'' and out of step with opinion in the party at large.
''What we have started here is a process of debate,'' he said on
Channel 4 News.
''I think it is very unfortunate that some people are wishing to
suggest that there should not be a debate on what replaces Clause 4,
that the party should simply dig in behind a text which is now over 80
years old.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article