THEY thought frustration had driven him back to Canada and out of the
picture altogether, but Fergus McCann's determination to resurrect the
fortunes of Celtic remains strong, and he has come up with a plan to
redevelop Celtic Park at a cost of around #36m, which would provide a
60,000 all-seated arena.
Since 1988, the Scottish-born McCann, now a Canadian businessman,
increasingly has been taking an interest in Celtic, and although he has
walked away in disgust a couple of times because of what he saw as a
lack of respect from the club's directors, he has returned to ask more
questions of the supporters, who hold the key.
A few weeks ago, he placed advertisements in newspapers seeking the
reaction of the fans to the club's problems.
He claims the ''heavy response'' to his questionnaires have made it
worth the effort to continue his quest to see Celtic on to a more solid
footing, and his latest plan -- the basic details of which are on their
way to all those who registered an interest -- allows for a rebuilt
stadium on the existing site.
He commissioned construction consultants Bucknall Austin to deliver a
concept design of a stadium with a capacity of 60,000 seats, and
although it should be made clear no planning permission has been sought,
McCann believes his scheme to be the only viable one, and given
sufficient support, all planning problems could be overcome.
The important thing so far as he is concerned is that he has the money
to put his plan into operation should he win over the fans, and then the
directors who have shunned him and his approaches in the past.
McCann says the last time he went public, Michael Kelly threatened
legal action, but so far there has been no move on that front.
''Michael Kelly should not make empty threats. That is not the way to
do business,'' McCann said, ''but if he wants to make them, he is free
to do so.''
McCann is aware that some people consider him to be something of an
eccentric, but the fact is he has a scheme which, he says, can be
funded.
In previous attempts to make the directors -- Chris White, Kevin and
Michael Kelly, Tom Grant, Jimmy Farrell, Jack McGinn, and David Smith --
listen to him, he had sought the backing of Brian Dempsey's group, but
differences of opinion prevented the blossoming of that alliance. At the
time he had to back off because he did not have enough money of his own
to continue, but that has changed.
''In the past year, Celtic have grown weaker while I have grown
stronger and I can raise the initial capital of #12.5m without them,''
he said last night. ''Also I have someone willing to back me, another
Canadian who has a passionate interest in Celtic but who does not want
to be in Glasgow thumping a table.
''I don't want to do it alone because it will all but dry me up
financially, but I feel it is worth pursuing. Around 5m, I believe,
could be raised from supporters, executive members, and other
packages.''
Of course, Celtic would be entitled to grants from the Football Trust,
and if he is allowed his way there would be a shares issue which, he
says, means there would be no take- over bids. The existing shares would
not be bought but the new shareholders would hold the majority.
In return for his investment McCann would want a 50% stake and the
right to run the club's business affairs only for a five-year period,
after which his shares would be offered to other shareholders.
He added: ''Under my scheme there would be money available for
increased salaries and transfers over the first three years. I want the
supporters to know all this and to see the sort of stadium which we can
all have if we are reasonable about this. I want them to be with me.
''All along I have heard excuses from some who said they would back me
in the past and also a terrified silence from the directors, but if the
fans can focus on something they know can happen, they could be a
powerful force.''
He is using another advert, this time in today's Herald, to measure
further the level of fan interest, but even if he receives another
encouraging response, he must realise it will take a mighty effort to
make the directors listen or, it seems, present their own financial
package for the Cambuslang dream.
A great many questions about the new Celtic Park remain unanswered
with deadlines for announcements having been set and missed.
McCann points out that since being formed, only #17,500 of
shareholders' money has gone into the club while from club pools,
something like #6m has been handed over and wonders who exactly is
paying for the Cambuslang venture which many believe is unlikely to
become a reality.
His own stadium plans have flaws, like the projected overhang of the
cemetery behind Janefield Street, but it is still only a concept and is
flexible.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article