BEING the diplomat that he clearly is, Ivan Tichanski was not for
criticising Rangers after having watched them grasp a 1-1 draw with
Dundee at Dens Park, but it was hard to resist the suspicion that
inwardly he was doing a Bulgarian folk dance at the prospect of his
team's European Champions' Cup-tie with the Ibrox side next week.
Mr Tichanski, who works under the grand title of Head of International
Dept and Public Relations for Levski Sofia, would be less than human if
he did not report with some optimism to his club.
Yet he was certainly telling the truth when he said that he was sure
Rangers would ''show a different face'' when they met the Bulgarian
side. ''Scottish teams play the same way at home and away,'' he said.
''And it will be hard for us. Rangers were one of the top teams in
Europe last year. But we have a chance.''
The Bulgarian will watch the Ibrox men again during his two-week stay
during which he will also take in the World Cup match at Pittodrie on
Wednesday. He was impressed by Mark Hateley and Duncan Ferguson, as well
as Trevor Steven in the second half.
That was maybe a bit further than most Rangers fans would have gone.
Hateley scored the goal and generally worked as hard as ever to lift his
team above the ordinary, without much success. Otherwise, there was not
a lot to say about Rangers' display. They improved in the later stages
but that was born out of energy and desire rather than imagination.
Hateley was scoring his second goal in two games, but even so he did
not need to tell us he is missing Ally McCoist. ''Ideally, I'd rather be
playing with my old partner. We have proved we get goals together,''
said the man who has had a variety of assistants in the front line this
season. He meant no disrespect to Duncan Ferguson, Ian Durrant, or David
Hagen, who have been up there alongside him, but the absence of the
McCoist style of play is a gap that cannot be filled.
If Ferguson had cost a couple of million, supporters would allow him
time to settle and learn the Rangers ropes, but his #4m tag and the
publicity before and after the signing inevitably bring great
expectations. He and Hateley seem too similar to bring out the best in
each other, however, but he still managed the odd flash of skill to
remind everyone what will happen in due course.
Hateley, like manager Walter Smith, felt that the two-hour contest
with Aberdeen in midweek left its mark on the Ibrox team, especially in
the first half, and he is right to point out that every game they play
now is like a cup final. ''We have 44 cup finals in the league before we
ever get to a cup final.''
Dundee gave his words full credence with a performance that was packed
with eagerness, determination, and confidence. Like most teams that meet
Rangers now, they were fully wound up and ready to spring once the
whistle went.
They might well have hung on to the goal scored by Gary Paterson early
in the first half, had it not been for an injury which forced
player-manager Jim Duffy to have himself substituted 10 minutes from the
end.
That was followed a minute later by the sending-off of Paul Ritchie,
who had been booked earlier on, for a reckless lunge at Richard Gough,
and the reduction to 10 men, allied to the absence of Duffy, left Dundee
in some disarray just at a time when Rangers had stepped up the chase
for the equaliser.
It was perhaps only surprising then that Rangers failed to add to the
one goal scored when a Ferguson header was parried by Paul Mathers and
Hateley nipped in to knock the ball over the line.
Duffy admitted that he might not have gone off himself if Ritchie had
been despatched earlier. ''I felt I was a bit of a liability because of
my ankle injury (Mark Hateley landed on it) but after Paul went off we
played very deep and let Rangers come at us. It was understandable but
it is the worst thing you can do against a team like Rangers.''
None the less, the new manager was delighted with the effort of his
players and had a special word for Paterson, who did a fine job against
Hateley.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article