A WOMAN died yesterday after being hit by flying debris at the
demolition of two 22-storey blocks of flats in Glasgow's Gorbals. Three
other people, one a policeman, were slightly injured among the 2000
spectators.
The dead woman, who at first was thought to have had a heart attack,
was later named as Mrs Helen Tinney, 61, of nearby Hutchesontown Court.
She died in the Victoria Infirmary soon after being admitted. She was
married with four children.
Police said she had been standing on a grassy area in Cumberland
Street, near the Cumberland Arms, with her sister waiting for the
demolition to take place. She was in an area designated as safe for the
public.
The injured were Ms Theresa Riley, 36, of Kintillo Drive,
Scotstounhill, who was treated for a head injury; Mr James Cowan, 61, of
Stanmore Road, Mount Florida, who made his own way to hospital and
received treatment for a cut to his thigh, and Constable Andrew Hynds,
based at London Road police station, who continued on duty despite a
head injury. Ms Riley and Mr Cowan were standing in the same area as the
dead woman.
Another casualty was a 21-year-old pregnant woman, Ms Tracey McDonald,
of Stirling Fauld Place, Kingston, who fainted at the explosion. An
ambulance took her to hospital but she was released without treatment.
Police and officials of the Health and Safety Executive, Glasgow
District Council and the demolition company, Ladkarn-Wreckers,
immediately began an on-the-spot investigation into how persons came to
be injured.
All the injured had been standing outside a safety exclusion zone, the
boundaries of which followed various streets in the heavily populated
area and was on average about 120 metres from the buildings being
demolished.
About 100 residents had been temporarily evacuated to the nearby
Blackfriars School while the demolition went ahead.
It had promised to be Glasgow's greatest ever free spectacle and it
brought the sun-filled streets of the Gorbals to a standstill for an
incredible 20 seconds.
It was billed as the biggest controlled explosion ever to take place
in Britain -- some experts said Europe -- since the war, and thousands
of city-dwellers made a pilgrimage to watch the destruction happen.
It was meant to be a successful operation to erase from the skyline
the two hideous and hated Sir Basil Spence designed 22-storey blocks of
flats using two and a half tons of gelignite.
A police spokesman said last night a report on the woman's death would
go to the procurator-fiscal. He said the inquiry would be into the death
''and anything else which had a bearing on her death''.
Mr Mike Higginbotham, a director of Ladkarn-Wreckers, said: ''We are
very, very sad about what has happened, but we don't actually know any
details.''
He added: ''The whole idea of this kind of explosive demolition is
that it is safe and easy. We can't comment because we really don't know
the circumstances.''
The Glasgow Central MP, Mr Mike Watson, inspected the scene last night
and immediately called for a comprehensive inquiry ''to ensure that such
a tragedy does not happen again at the demolition of a tower block''.
He added: ''There seems to be little doubt that the woman was struck
by flying debris. Something has gone seriously wrong with the explosion.
I saw debris was scattered over quite a wide area with large chunks of
concrete visible in several gardens some distance from the site and a
number of windows broken.''
Local councillor James Mutter, who was a friend of the dead woman,
said he was some 140 metres away from those who were injured and could
see debris going up in the air.
''It seemed to be a well organised event but I was always concerned
about a building of this size being demolished because it is the first
of its type.''
Before it was known that there had been casualties, a news conference
had been taken by Mr Ian Taylor, of Glasgow District Council's building
control department, who explained that the demolition had not been the
complete success they had been looking for. Because of the situation
others, including representatives of the contractors, were still at the
scene.
When the roar of 6000 separate explosions -- it came over as seven or
eight very loud bangs -- died away, and the dust, like ash erupting from
a volcano, cleared there was not the heap of rubble expected by the
demolishers. Two sections of one block remained in large pieces and one
section sat uncomfortably at a height of about three storeys above the
debris.
Mr Taylor said that while the smaller block at Queen Elizabeth Square
had come down as planned, the larger block was left with two mounds of
huge pieces of the building intact. The larger section, he said, was
''hanging rather precariously'' over a shopping centre, Cumberland
Arcade. Rubble had also fallen on an old bank building.
Mr Taylor said an assessment of the situation was being carried out,
which would lead them to decide which parts could be taken down by
mechanical means and how the remains of the block could be made safe to
allow tenants back into their homes in adjacent flats.
He was also questioned then about the two hitches in the demolition.
The blast was originally set for 12 noon. It was then put back to 1pm.
Later it was retimed for 2pm with the statement that if this did not
happen the blast would be rescheduled for today. The explosion took
place at 2.14.
Mr Taylor said the delays had been for technical reasons because of
misreadings due to electrical interference caused by copper piping in
the building.
He said of the demolition: ''It should have been a total success. We
will have to determine the reasons why it has not been a success.''
He added that the demolition contractors had the job of carrying out
the work and they were responsible for what happened and making good any
damage.
He said it had been confirmed that all the explosive charges had
exploded.
Meetings to plan the ''blowdown'' had been going on for several months
to ensure that everything went right on the big day. The #873,000
contract to bring down the two blocks was supervised by the city's
building control department and involved more than 200 people from 20
different organisations within and outwith the council.
Opinion was that controlled demolition was considerably safer and less
expensive than traditional ''deconstruction'', which would have cost
#1.5m.
Mr Richard Gibb, the council's assistant director of building control,
who was co-ordinating the exercise, said he did not know the exact
circumstances of the personal injuries, but he expressed regret on
behalf of the council.
He understood that those hit by flying debris had been standing,
watching the demolition, at the corner of Cumberland Street and Hallside
Place, at the south-west corner of the exclusion zone.
The safety zone had been set at 120 metres from the demolition work, a
distance of twice the height of the buildings, as prescribed by the
Health and Safety Executive. Mr Gibb said not all of the buildings had
come down as far as had been hoped, while others had fallen in a way
that was not predicted.
Limited damage had been caused to surrounding property, most notably a
disused bank, while a possible risk remained to a block of shops off Old
Rutherglen Road.
Last night a two-metre high fence was being erected to keep the site
secure and staff from a private security firm were patrolling the area.
The buildings being demolished were a mixture of precast,
pre-stressed, and panelled concrete. Charges had been placed both on the
inside and on the outside of the buildings and Mr Gibb said he believed
all the charges had successfully detonated.
Three other council blocks have been demolished by explosives in
recent months; at Roystonhill, Germiston, and Castlemilk.
All three were carried out by a company called Controlled Demolition,
and hailed as complete successes, with damage limited to only one broken
window in neighbouring property.
That company had tendered for yesterday's job but its bid was not the
cheapest. The council was obliged, under local government legislation,
to accept the cheapest offer considered safe.
The successful bid was made by a consortium involving Wreckers, which
has an international record, and English-based Ladkarn.
Under the terms of the contract the firms were obliged to provide #10m
of insurance for property and any third party damages and they will be
responsible for claims if liability can be established.
A controlled explosion is regarded by the HSE as the safest method of
removing multi-storey blocks. An alternative, manual dismantling,
carries more risk for workers involved.
The HSE was informed of yesterday's incident and an investigation is
under way. A fatal accident inquiry is likely to be held into the death
of Mrs Tinney if it is proved that she was hit by debris.
Police spokesman Superintendent Eric Webb, based at Gorbals, said he
understood Mrs Tinney had been hit by debris from the explosion.
Several windows at the police station were broken by the blast, which
had not been predicted.
Almost 100 district council residents, who had been moved from their
homes yesterday before the explosion, were allowed home last night. A
further 17, from seven households nearest to the site, were evacuated
last Tuesday and were not due to return until later this week. This may
now be delayed.
No other council buildings are due for demolition by explosion in the
near future.
A police spokesman confirmed last night that an incident had occurred
during a test explosion at the site 11 days ago.
He said:' 'It would appear that there was a test explosion at about
11am on September 2 and, as a result, a passing car in Commercial Road
was struck by some masonry. The offside rear passenger door was damaged
but no-one was injured.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article