Lord Grimond of Firth: Liberal Party leader 1956-67.
JO Grimond was Liberal leader at a time when his party was reduced to
its lowest fortunes in modern Britain. Grimond's Liberal Party was never
a serious contender for power and in two out of three of his three
General Election campaigns failed even to contest a majority of
parliamentary seats. Yet Grimond's lively leadership saved the Liberals
from political oblivion: to the party he brought stability and he lived
to see Liberalism as a revived, formidable force in national affairs.
Joseph Grimond was born in St Andrews in July 1913, the youngest child
of a Dundee jute manufacturer. His early days were happy. He proceeded
through Eton and Oxford -- making lifelong friendships with such as
Jasper Ridley and William Douglas-Home -- before pursuing a legal career
in London. In 1938, he married Laura Bonham-Carter, granddaughter of
Herbert Asquith and scion of a great Liberal dynasty. Their partnership
was to be long and steadfast.
Grimond's politics were like himself -- vague and tweedy, clean and
nice. After war service, he stood for the Liberals in Orkney and
Shetland in the 1945 election. It was a disastrous poll for the party
nationally -- virtually all its leaders were defeated and only 12
Liberals returned to the Commons -- and he came within 500 votes of
winning the seat. After five years in the South working for the United
Nations and then the National Trust for Scotland, he returned to fight
again in 1950, and won.
''I never canvassed,'' he said. ''To ask anyone how they were going to
vote would have seemed impudent to many of my constituents. Laura once
approached the subject obliquely. She got a terse and dusty answer --
'The folk in this parish will vote as they think fit. They will vote
Liberal if they be of that mind.' '' Such were Grimond's constituents,
whom he came to love. South of the Pentland Firth, he had little to
encourage his ambitions.
Irish home rule, the Great War, and years of internecine strife had
long since ruined the Liberal Party. The ageing Clement Davies was the
only senior figure to survive the 1945 election and under him the party
drifted unhappily. Grimond's victory in 1950 was the only glory in a
debacle. The party lost 319 deposits. The next election came barely a
year later. The Liberals fielded a mere 109 candidates and took all of
2.6% of the poll. Only six MPs were returned and of these only Grimond
had won against Tory oppostion. The party faced extinction.
All six MPs survived the 1955 election but the following year Clement
Davies retired. Grimond succeed him. The party had little choice. Of
available MPs, one was deputy chairman of ways and means in the House of
Commons and debarred from active party work, two could not hope to hold
their seats should the Conservatives choose to oppose them, and a fourth
was a busy barrister. On November 5, Jo Grimond became the new Liberal
leader.
He faced a rocky ride. The party promptly split over Suez, before
uniting to condemn Conservative policy as Eden fell from power -- a
dangerous manouevre when Liberal MPs owed survival to a Tory pact. In
1957, Carmarthen was lost in a by-election -- to none less than Megan
Lloyd-George -- and the Liberals were reduced to five seats. Still, in
Rochdale the following year -- fielding a young Ludovic Kennedy -- they
came a convincing second. Two weeks later, Grimond's brother-in-law Mark
Bonham-Carter won Torrington. The party polled well in a succession of
similar contests; high Liberal votes in such Scottish seats as East
Aberdeenshire, Argyll, and Galloway presaged SNP triumphs in years
ahead.
In the 1959 General Election, the Liberals lost Torrington but gained
North Deveon with the bright Jeremy Thorpe, and the average vote in
contested seats rose markedly. The Labour Party had lost a third
successive election, while the Liberals were making discernable
progress. A serious renaissance was beginning. In the Paisley
by-election, John Bannerman came within 2000 votes of success. In the
next 10 months, as the Macmillan Government hit trouble and Labour tore
itself apart over defence, the Liberals came second in eight
by-elections and won dozens of seats in municipal government.
In March 1962, the party missed Blackpool North by a mere 973 votes. A
week later came the sensational Orpington result. This middle-class
commuter suburb, which had given the Tories a 1959 majority of 14,760,
now returned Eric Lubbock as Liberal MP by an astonishing 7855 votes. It
was a high point of Grimond's career. A Daily Mail opinion-poll showed
that the Liberals were the most popular party in the country.
Strong Liberal votes followed apace. Montgomery was held easily after
Clement Davies's death. In May, the party stormed municipal elections in
such Home County fortresses as Finchley and Aldershot. A high Liberal
vote in North-East Leicester that July -- along with a humiliating
Conservative performance -- prompted Macmillan's desperate ''night of
the long knives'' Cabinet reshuffle. ''Greater love hath no man than
this, that he lay down his friends for his life,'' quipped Jeremy
Thorpe.
All pondered ''Orpington Man'', this new prosperous middle-class voter
who could turn Liberal when tempted. It seemed that the party was no
longer at the mercy of Tory pacts and the ''Celtic fringe'' -- Wales,
the Highlands, and the West Country. Liberalism achieved publicity it
had not known for a generation. Membership rocketed and finances rose by
50%. But the tide was already ebbing. Slowly Liberal support fell in
opinion polls and by-elections. New Tory and Labour leaders jousted for
No. 10 and the Liberal Party was squeezed to death.
''Orpington Man'', in truth, was but a blip. The Liberals had only
seduced a protest vote. Grimond sought ''radical re-alignment'' in
political Britain but the Labour Party showed no interest. And the
Orpington victory lies sour in history. The Conservative candidate,
Peter Goldman, was a Jew with a very Jewish name. Lubbock's supporters
had included the most notorious bigots in town.
Labour won the General Election with a tiny majority. The Liberals
polled well, fielding 365 candidates, but took just nine seats. Only
David Steel's victory in the Roxburgh by-election of March 1965 -- which
precipitated Douglas-Home's retiral as Tory leader -- augured well. The
party had lost its way. Grimond's unwise remarks to a Guardian
interviewer -- to the effect that rapprochement with Labour was
desirable if the two parties could agree on aims -- provoked hostility
from his colleagues.
The Liberals were ill-prepared for the 1966 General Election. Liberal
candidates faced crushing defeat in all seats which they had no hope of
taking and Grimond's leadership was in doubt -- he was talking openly of
giving up. But a cheerful manifesto was drafted. ''For All The People''
proffered heavy defence cuts, entry into the Common Market, and more
amenable industrial relations. In the event, the party put forward 311
candidates and won 12 seats. Yet their vote had plunged. The hopes of
Orpington were gone.
In the midst of the campaign, Grimond's eldest son, Andrew, committed
suicide. The tragedy scarred his father deeper than Grimond ever
revealed -- autobiographical references to the boy are chillingly bright
-- and it hastened abdication. Early in 1967 he announced his retiral.
''It alters nothing,'' wrote John Vincent sourly in the New Statesman.
''It introduces no new factor. It stresses, if it needed stressing, that
the hopes of the Grimond era are as dead as the Liberal Conservatism of
the Macmillan era . . . for 10 years it has lived in a dream that was
never probable and is now probably impossible.'' Less cruelly, Roy
Douglas memorialised: ''Any Parliament would probably benefit fom the
existence of a dozen or so cross-benchers of Grimond's type; people
whose political judgement is sometimes extraordinarily faulty and even
naive, but who at times perceive important political truths with quite
exceptional clarity.''
Grimond was only 54. He stayed in Parliament and continued as a
Liberal spokesman. When scandal overwhelmed Jeremy Thorpe in 1976,
several MPs -- including David Steel -- implored Grimond to return. He
consented only to serve as interim leader while the party prepared to
elect Thorpe's successor.
He concentrated on local interests. He negotiated skilfully for extra
powers in the islands councils -- especially for oil-boom Shetland --
and fought successfully for a clause in the Scotland Act that would
exclude Shetland from Assembly control should she vote no in the
referendum. His agreeable if chaotic memoirs were published in 1979.
Under Mrs Thatcher's Government, he urged powerfully for liberal
co-operation with the new Social Democrats. He drafted his own political
credo -- A Personal Manifesto was published in 1982. For a time, another
''radical alternative'' rode high. But that too would fall.
In 1983, he retired to the Upper House as Lord Grimond of Firth. He
gave occasional interviews and spoke in the Lords when the mood took
him. He moved in Anglo-Scots society, alternating time in London with
long contemplative spells at his home, the Old Manse of Kirkwall. He
would never serve in a Liberal Government -- never see one -- but in the
far north, under high grey skies, he found perspective and peace.
''A curious combination of oil and seals have half-awakened
Southerners to the existence of regions even north of Caithness,'' wrote
Grimond puckishly in 1979. ''It is to be expected, I suppose, that I
have received a hundred times more letters about the killing of seals
that I have about any other matter. Three letters made up my total
postbag on Scottish devolution, more than 1300 on seals.''
Paul Johnson said: ''I don't think I have ever heard him say anything,
in public or private, which is not sensible, true, rational, and decent.
Even the most malicious political gossips have never accused him of a
mean or underhand or even merely devious act. He has supported many
unpopular causes simply because he felt them to be right.''
Grimond's impact on national life was minimal. His true monument is
the Liberal Party itself. He inherited a nostalgic little club without
creed and without organisation. He created a modern, gutsy body that at
least turned its back on interwar failure and began to hammer out a
distinctive contribution to public affairs. Under his leadership, future
princes entered Parliament -- John Pardoe and Emlyn Hooson, Russell
Johnston and David Steel.
Steel was one of many drawn to the Liberal party by its energetic
leader. But neither Steel nor Thorpe could overcome what had broken
Grimond -- the struggle of leading an uneasy coalition through dreary
flats to passing success and translating a powerful but ephemeral
protest vote into the solid support that alone could restore a Liberal
Britain.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article