Agnes Owens, at 67 about to have her
third novel published, has known great
personal tragedy, but manages to keep
smiling through the wreckage. She tells
Lesley Duncan her philosophy
LARCHES are greening by the lochside. Houseboats on the Leven could be
posing for a Scottish colourist. Spring, even on a damp Friday morning,
touches Balloch. But the Haldane estate is a dispiriting place. Its grey
streets of fifties/sixties council housing have a surly, unkempt look,
hardly softened by the occasional clump of daffodils or flashy car. A
sense of communal defeat hangs in the air.
The wooden-framed house in Roy Young Avenue does not stand out from
its environment. The woman who opens the door, however, is a phenomenon.
At 67 she is about to have her third novel published -- and by one of
the classiest of London houses, Bloomsbury. Inside the miniature hall, I
bark my leg on a gate on the stairs. It's for the grandchildren, Agnes
Owens apologises, as she leads me upstairs to the converted bedroom
which is the powerhouse for a subtle and mysterious talent.
Agnes Owens burst on the Scottish literary scene 10 years ago with her
novel Gentlemen of the West, first published by Polygon, then two years
later by Penguin. It was a bleakly comic tale about a 22-year-old
brickie whose customary haunt was the pub so beloved by the Scottish
working-class male of fiction (and frequently fact). But it did much
more than dredge the shallows of west of Scotland proletarian culture.
Even in this first book Agnes Owens displayed a confident laconic style
and throwaway humour. It was a notable debut.
Owens -- gaunt-featured and soft-voiced -- recalls its genesis in a
local writers' group where she was encouraged by James Kelman, Alasdair
Gray, Liz Lochhead, and the late Joan Ure.
There is a tremendous amount of drinking in her books. Is this
something she has seen at close quarters? ''Yes, it's odd but I can't
get away from drink, I seem to have to introduce it. I could never write
about drugs -- not that I don't know about drugs -- but I find that a
humourless situation. Sometimes drink can be funny, but it's a dangerous
situation as well.''
The central figure of Owens's new novel A Working Mother -- set in the
1950s -- is Betty, who works as a typist to support her war-haunted
husband Adam and two children. A manipulative woman (and presumably an
attractive one, though she is never described), Betty should be squashed
by circumstance but for most of the book handles the boozy Adam, his
amorous friend Brendan, and her odd employer Mr Robson, with ruthless
panache. Drink destroys her in the end.
Was the book to some extent autobiographical? ''Not really,'' Owens
says. ''I suppose I've drunk in my time and fought with my husband --
I've had two husbands; one of them died -- and we've had situations when
you wake up despairingly the next morning and say, oh, I'll never act
like that again, but the actual plot was purely fictitious. I'd
certainly never write an autobiography. My God, the family would never
speak to me again!''
Owens has not been prolific -- a volume of short stories, Lean Tales,
shared with James Kelman and Alasdair Gray, another novel, Birds in the
Wilderness (originally Gentlemen of the North), and a play co-written
with Liz Lochhead, form the tally. Work and family responsibilities as
well as her self-critical approach may be the explanation.
Economy is central to her style. Her writing lacks any analytical
superstructure. Yet with minimalist means she can produce psychological
subtlety, ironic ambiguity.
Owens says she found it quite easy to get into the narrative style of
her new heroine but at the back of her mind thought: ''This novel will
do feminism no good!'' She adds that she wasn't setting out to do
feminism any good. Instead of having her central character a poor,
downtrodden person, she has made her a ''really trollopy woman'', though
able in her own way, and still a mother.
Owens herself was the mother of seven children; only six now. Her
youngest, Patrick, was stabbed to death six-and-a-half years ago at the
age of 19.
The tragic facts emerge as she considers her own lack of
sentimentality. ''I don't know what's wrong with me that I don't suffer
from it. I think maybe a hardness has come into my soul. Maybe it's age,
maybe it's what's happened to Patrick.''
Her son was killed locally. ''He was in his house and he had a fight
and, you know, it wasn't much more than that, but they called him out
unbeknown to us and we got there too late. They called him out with
stones at the window. And the sentences -- there were three of them --
were very trivial.
''The one that actually stabbed him, I've seen him two or three times
this year. His relatives stay here. The other two I don't see. They were
just done for assault.''
The heartbreaking matter-of-factness continues. ''I think to myself,
I've survived, I haven't sat in the house and stared out the window. I
went out. I've written. I laugh a lot. I don't think I'm too
unhappy-looking. But at the same time I feel terrible every day. It
never goes away.''
It's inappropriate to ask whether she had ever seen her writing as a
lever into a different milieu. But had she not thought of moving away
after the tragedy -- or would that have seemed some kind of defeat?
''I also thought I would be leaving Patrick. But I never had any
inclination to leave. I wanted to cling on to something. Anyway you
can't really escape anything. It would be a lot worse in a strange
place. At least I know people here and to start all over again would
have been just another terrible imposition. I suppose I have a love-hate
relationship with this place.''
Another reason for staying is the proximity of grandchildren who
distract her agreeably from her writing. Five live locally; she mentions
a daughter in France, and then adds with precise vagueness, ''I think
I've got about 12 grandchildren altogether.''
She herself was brought up as a Protestant but says she was always
attracted to Catholics. Patrick, her present husband, is Catholic, as
are her younger children. ''But for me, I don't have any religion.''
Perhaps, though, that very background has contributed to her
individual voice? She is sceptical, pointing out that she couldn't even
make herself heard in the family. ''It's hard to have a family and be a
feminist.''
Her family have no literary aspirations, but then neither did she when
she was young. She did poorly at Bearsden Academy. ''My father wanted me
to be clever and I didn't. I used to say I wanted to go to work in the
papermill.'' She avoided that fate, but ''managed to learn some
shorthand and typing'' at college. Part-time jobs included a stint in a
cosmetics factory in London at the age of 18 (''to me the bosses were
the type that would have done well in a concentration camp''), with a
lighting firm in Glasgow, and as a cleaner to Billy Connolly when he
lived near Drymen.
Though she thinks ''it's very nice to be kind of associated'' with the
trio of Kelman, Gray, and Lochhead, she wants to be regarded as an
individual writer. She doesn't envy the ''much wider audience'' the
others have achieved.
''I don't want to be famous in this particular part of the world, in
this little place where I live.'' When she goes on her publisher's
circuit of London, Edinburgh, Glasgow, and Dundee this month, she may
find she cannot avoid wider celebrity.
* A Working Mother by Agnes Owens is published by Bloomsbury at #9.99.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article