ON MY way back into London from bosky Barnes and the handsome abode
that Peter Bowles calls home, I picked up one of those heavyweight
Sunday review sections. Plastered across the back page was ''The Old
Smoothie'' (Jameson's triple distilled) and a huge picture of Bowles
nursing a large one. We will not hold it against him, although I do
think we should be told what a man who proudly boasts of being half
Scots is doing extolling ''the exceptional smoothness'' of Irish
whiskey.
In the meantime, though, let us simply say that there is no offence
under the Trade Descriptions Act because Peter Bowles is indeed an old
smoothie. A class act. Charm personified. There aren't many big-name
actors around who would welcome you to their palatial pads of a Sunday
morning, with a glass of the finest fizz in a flute that is personally
monogrammed.
Peter Bowles? Arguably the best-known face on TV? Well, he's to the
manner born, isn't he? A bit of a toff? It all comes out in the posh
doesn't it? Actually, no. Bowles may have cornered the telly market in
upper-class bounders in blazers and turned suave, snobbish insincerity
into a lucrative sitcom art form, but he is in truth a pretty ordinary
working-class chap who happens, through a talent to amuse, to have done
rather well for himself, perhaps because of his upstairs-downstairs
childhood and a deeply thrawn desire to achieve.
His parents were in service on the Beaverbrook estate in
Nottinghamshire and the family lived in a cottage in the grounds. His
mother, a Newton Stewart lass, was brought up in Wishaw, and as a girl
trained as a nannie with the Duke of Argyll's family. ''When she came to
England, she was nannie to Lord Beaverbrook's daughters and my father
was valet to Lord Sandwich's son, Drogo Montagu, and then my father was
a sort of butler to Lord Beaverbrook's daughter and that's how my
parents met.'' When Bowles was six, his father became a chauffeur with
Rolls-Royce and the family moved to a two-up-two-down in Nottingham.
Some interviewers have made much of the tin bath and the clog shop on
the corner.
Educated at Nottingham Grammar School, Bowles was a bright boy who got
into RADA at 16, where his contemporaries were Albert Finney, Peter
O'Toole, Alan Bates, and Richard Briers. The scholarship was renewable
each term, and Bowles had to appear in front of a board every few months
to have his work assessed. The result was that while Finney et al hung
on to their flat, working-class vowels, Bowles lost his. ''I did what I
was told; I had to. It was absolutely mandatory for me to lose my
accent. I think I could have been taught in such a way, though, that I
could have hung on to my own accent and done received pronunciation like
any other accent, Cockney or Midlands or whatever.
''So, yes, I was a bit lost. I felt I lost something of myself when I
lost my accent. I denied a part of myself. Happily, though, I have
recovered from that. But, you see, I was terribly deferential to
authority then.'' Also, he points out, his parents made the most
tremendous sacrifices in order to send him to drama school, so he had to
do well. ''That was what their generation did. I first got into RADA on
a pass or entrance and there was one scholarship to be given at the end
of the first term to the best student of the 120 on the intake. My
parents could afford to send me for only that one term and my mum went
out at night to pay the fees.
''My father worked during the day and my mother worked in a hospital
at night. Then I won the scholarship which meant my fees were paid, but
they looked at it at the end of every term so I couldn't do too much
wrong. My mum still had to keep going out to work to keep me there, so
they made this huge sacrifice -- my father by not having his wife at
home with him every evening and my mother by working so very hard.''
But Bowles also worked. ''I used to wash dishes at the Grosvenor House
Hotel from seven every evening until two in the morning, then go home
and sleep and be at college at 9.30am. I thought nothing of it,'' he
recalls. ''Indeed, I enjoyed it enormously.'' Nowadays, he notes,
students send begging letters to rich and famous actors such as he in
order to pay their fees. He helps where he can, but says it is something
he would not have dreamt of doing while he was polishing plates along
with his vowels -- ''it just wasn't the sort of thing one did. How times
have changed,'' he says, popping another champagne cork with practised
ease.
As to the RADA voice, which is treated with such derision today, well,
he bemoans the fact that so few young actors can speak received
pronunciation. ''I think actors now are actually starting to speak a bit
'off', to give themselves some sort of political correctness. They seem
to think that you have more street-cred if you talk 'loike that'. The
greatest example of this, of course, is Nigel Kennedy.'' And, he asks,
elegantly crossing his long legs, stylishly encased in cream slub silk,
have I noticed that actors today have no idea how to move or how to wear
costumes? ''When I went to RADA, we were told how to sit, how to stand,
how to move. We had dancing classes. We were shown how to deal with
cigarettes and lighters and pouring tea, the whole etiquette of society
of the twenties and thirties. Nowadays, even if they have lovely
figures, they still wear their costumes as though they were sacks and
they throw their legs about all over the place. They have no idea how to
sit.''
Peter Bowles will soon be giving a masterclass in all of the above, as
well as displaying his dazzling skills as a farceur richly gifted in
comic timing, when he tours Noel Coward's 1939 comedy, Present Laughter,
prior to a West End opening. He will play the supremely egotistical
actor, Gary Essendine, ''complete with all of Coward's curlicues''.
Essendine is one of those actors so much in love with himself that if he
were chocolate he would devour himself. Surely there are no actors
around today who are that self-obsessed?
From above the rim of his champagne glass, Bowles somehow manages to
keep a straight face long enough to remark that, well, every interview
he has ever read with an actor, particularly American ones, creates the
lasting impression that actors are entirely self-obsessed. Which is
exactly what appeals to him about this play. What Coward has done, he
thinks, is to present a very true portrayal of ''the genuine neuroses of
actors. The true self-doubt.''
On the surface, Gary Essendine is an extremely selfish, arrogant man
who is always going on about his timorous belief in himself, remarks
Bowles. The result is he is always watching himself acting. And that is
actually very true of actors. They are like that. Surely not? Oh yes,
there is this thing of taking off the mask and finding another mask
underneath, and it can be quite disturbing. Nevertheless, he declares,
actors should not be taken seriously. The theatre is full of half-mad
people. And nobody who is involved in it minds one bit. ''To outsiders,
we are a very neurotic bunch. Going up for jobs and being rejected can
have quite a devastating effect, you know, so actors tend to live on
their nerves. Also, you have to retain a certain childishness. And that
can look a bit ridiculous when you are fully grown, you know.''
Surely Peter Bowles, the actor, no longer lives on his nerves? Surely
he has it all? He has been happily married for 35 years to Susan
Bennett, a former actress, and mother of his three grown-up children,
two sons and a daughter. Their enviable and rather grand seven-bedroom,
three-bathroom house is filled with exquisite furniture and a stunning
collection of modern British paintings. In the driveway where gravel
crunches expensively underfoot there are several sleek motor cars. But,
no, he does not have it all. The thing Peter Bowles so patently lacks
and longs for is credibility as a serious actor. There are still theatre
people around who see him only as an empty Savile Row suit, an actor who
can shoot a cuff as neatly as a comic punchline. And this galls him.
Tall, urbane, and extremely intelligent, 57-year-old Bowles obviously
feels that fate has bowled him a googly in the shape of TV success. It
is clear that he remains nakedly ambitious to be a successful classical
actor as well as a famous TV face. Is he still ambitious? ''Oh yes,'' he
replies, ''very much so. Because success was such a long time coming.''
He is not a man who gives up easily, he says. In his early years, he
reminds you, his career was halt and lame, it limped along. He played
villains in The Avengers and Danger Man, he gave his all in such movies
as Antonioni's Blow Up and Richardson's The Charge of the Light Brigade.
But he was truly a late starter.
On leaving RADA, he was told that because of his extreme height he
could expect to get along very nicely by playing policemen. A casting
director told him he was too tall to play Englishmen and that he should
go away and learn Spanish and Italian. Another told him he was too posh.
Then when he was in his forties, he hit the big time. He was nouveau
riche but nice in the sitcom, To the Manor Born, opposite Penelope
Keith. He starred as Major Yeates in Channel 4's first-ever drama
series, The Irish R.M., and then in another long-running comedy,
Executive Stress, which was followed by the series with James Bolam,
Only When I Laugh. He was the smoothie-chops Fleet Street gossip
columnist in Lytton's Diary, the stuck-up Judge in Rumpole of the
Bailey, and the consummate con-man in Perfect Scoundrels.
And yet, and yet. No Chekhov, no Ibsen, and no Shakespeare. None of
the roles which give your average thespian intellectual clout. ''I came
into this business expecting to be a classical actor,'' he says, barely
able to conceal his chagrin. ''All my thoughts at RADA were to be a
classical actor. But the classics are done by the big companies or by
the directors from the big companies and for reasons best known to them
I have never been asked. And I do know that one of them -- because it
has been fed back to me -- has said that it is because I have had
enormous popularity through television, and that seems to worry them. I
think for some people I have a very powerful image, and some directors
prefer to mould actors their way.
''Although I was a supporting actor until I was 43 or 44, I have
always been a bit of a maverick; I have always spoken my mind. I have
always been fearless. And I suppose that they are nervous of me, and I
suppose that, yes, I do have a very strong image.'' His answer to this
is to create his own work because the one thing he knows for sure is
that the name Peter Bowles can put bottoms on seats. He has also made
something of a second career out of putting forward ideas for entire TV
series, such as Lytton's Diary and Perfect Scoundrels, both of which he
devised.
His ambition does not stop with television, though. He has even had
the nerve to step -- brilliantly, as it happened -- into Olivier's shoes
by playing Archie Rice in John Osborne's The Entertainer. ''Some people
were rather cross about it,'' he says, looking mildly perplexed.
Opposite Michael Gambon, ''the greatest actor of the day'', he played in
Alan Ayckbourn's Man of the Moment. Last year he starred opposite
Patricia Hodge in Rattigan's Separate Tables. He has toured Simon Gray's
Otherwise Engaged, in which he starred as well as directed, and then
Gray wrote the hilarious TV comedy film, Running Late, with Bowles
specifically in mind. But we await his Uncle Vanya, his Master Builder,
with some impatience, and he hints that something so intellectually
respectable as Chekhov or Ibsen may yet be on the cards with Sir Peter
Hall directing.
Meanwhile, he has thought up two other television series, which he is
also co-producing. One is a comedy drama series exploring the myth of
the country-cottage. The other is First Loves Found about a father and
daughter who set up an agency to find other people's first loves. ''I
have always been fascinated about what has happened to my first love.
You know, where she is, how she is, if she is still alive. Just where is
she now? The idea for this series opens up a whole Pandora's box of
drama. Think of films like The Third Man or Bad Day at Black Rock, they
are about people walking into a situation and tapping someone on the
shoulder and saying, 'Excuse me, this is the past . . . ' ''
The opening 90-minute episode for this series, with Bowles playing the
leading man, has already been written. So what about his first love?
Tell me more . . . He would rather not discuss her, he says, evasively
but with characteristic charm. ''If the series is done, I will talk
about her quite a lot. Indeed, if the series is done, I hope to go on a
journey with someone who is responsible as a writer and we'll try to
find her. My first love was . . . '' he pauses, dramatically. ''Yes, it
will be a fascinating story I have to tell. Because my first love was a
very strange affair.''
* Present Laughter is at the Theatre Royal, Glasgow, from August
29-September 3.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article