PADDY Meehan, whose case became a legal cause celebre following his
wrongful conviction for the murder of an Ayr pensioner 25 years ago,
yesterday died of throat cancer in a Swansea hospital at the age of 67.
Mr Meehan received a royal pardon in 1976, seven years into his life
sentence. He had spent those in solitary confinement proclaiming his
innocence.
His case, one of the most notorious in Scottish legal history, was the
subject of a prolonged campaign and several books, and was taken up by
journalist and broadcaster Ludovic Kennedy.
The subsequent Hunter inquiry took five years and failed to clear Mr
Meehan's name, leaving him ''pardoned for a crime he did not commit''
and so enraging him he made several legal bids to re-open his case.
The murder of Mrs Rachel Ross in 1969 scandalised Scotland. Two men
broke into the Ayr house the 72-year-old pensioner shared with her
husband Abraham.
They tied up the wealthy couple before bludgeoning Mrs Ross, who
sustained horrific head injuries from which she died. Mr Ross, beside
her, was not found for a further 24 hours.
Mr Meehan, a safebreaker, was well known to police and was immediately
questioned. He said that he had been with Jim Griffiths -- who had a
record of violence -- in Stranraer that night.
Griffiths's actions when the police arrived convinced many of Mr
Meehan's apparent guilt and set in motion the events leading to his
eventual conviction.
Pathologically afraid of prison, Griffiths met the police with a hail
of bullets, and embarked on a daylight rampage through Glasgow. He
killed one man and wounded 12 other people before being shot dead.
Represented by Sir Nicholas Fairbairn, QC, and solicitor Mr Joseph
Beltrami, Mr Meehan was subsequently found guilty by a majority verdict
of murder, and sentenced to life imprisonment.
Doubts began to emerge over the conviction, and other names came into
the frame for the murder. William ''Tank'' McGuiness and underworld
figure Ian Waddell were named by Ludovic Kennedy as the killers of
Rachel Ross in a 1975 book, A Presumption of Innocence.
Waddell had confessed his guilt, claimed Mr Kennedy, and following Mr
Meehan's pardon, he was put on trial -- and cleared -- for Mrs Ross's
murder.
An inquiry headed by Lord Hunter was ordered by the then Scottish
Secretary Bruce Millan, and, after five years, its report advanced the
theory that Mr Meehan had indeed been present together with Griffiths
and two other men the night Mrs Ross was attacked.
The Hunter report additionally found insufficient evidence to support
Mr Meehan's claim that he had been the victim of a police conspiracy.
His battle for compensation for his years spent in prison was finally
concluded when he was awarded #50,000 in 1984.
The former safe-breaker then had a brief career selling burglar
alarms, and then double-glazing.
His fight was not over, however, and he started a well-publicised feud
with Mr Beltrami, as well as continuing to press through the courts for
his case to be reopened.
Mr Beltrami published a book, A Deadly Innocence: The Meehan File, in
November 1989, an account which Mr Meehan claimed was inaccurate.
Mr Meehan further recorded his thoughts on Mr Beltrami in his own
book, Framed by MI5, which he wrote after leaving Glasgow almost 10
years ago to settle close to family in Port Talbot.
In Framed by MI5, which Mr Meehan could often be seen hawking around
Glasgow streets, he claimed he had been the victim of an elaborate
conspiracy, concocted by the security services, to keep him quiet over
what he described as his role in the escape of Soviet spy George Blake
from a London prison in 1966.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article