WOMEN were given the go-ahead to become priests in the Scottish
Episcopal Church at its General Synod in Edinburgh yesterday.
An amendment to the Church's canons to allow the ordination of women
to the priesthood secured two-thirds majorities in all three houses on
its second reading.
The house of laity, in which on last year's first reading a two-thirds
majority was only just reached, yesterday voted by 56 against 22, with
one abstention, for the measure.
The house of clergy voted 66 to 12 with one abstention, and the house
of bishops by six for, with none against.
The Primus, the Most Rev. Richard Holloway, Bishop of Edinburgh, said
later he was delighted. He was glad such large majorities had been
achieved, because two-thirds was itself a hard fence to leap.
Asked about fears that the decision would divide the Church and cause
male priests to resign, Bishop Holloway said he would be surprised if
many left. He did not think there would be more than three.
The Church would not make formal provision to compensate those who
felt compelled to resign their office, but the College of Bishops would
consider each specific case compassionately and justly, he said.
''No-one will be impoverished.''
The Synod agreed that the Church's first women priests would be
ordained on December 17.
There are already 63 women deacons, the first rung of the ladder of
the clergy, and Bishop Hollway estimated that 50 women priests could be
ordained in December.
An amendment by the diocese of Argyll and the Isles to delay
implementation of the canon until the synod could make financial
provision for those who felt compelled to resign was heavily defeated.
After the decision, Mr Robin Angus, Edinburgh, a layman, who said he
had been opposed to women priests, moved a resolution intended to
reconcile the different sides and calling on all branches of the Church
to continue to work together in love.
This resolution was overwhelmingly carried, and the Primus and Mr
Angus embraced each other on the platform .
Opposition had came from lay members who last year formed a group
called Our Living Church and launched a petition calling for the
procedure to be halted to allow much deeper consideration to take place
before a decision was made.
Mrs Elizabeth Anderson, Glasgow, said yesterday that since it had been
reported this week that many of the clergy had refused to let their
congregations consider the petition, members had shown interest in it.
More than 1150 communicants had now signed.
Mrs Mary Woodcock, Dunoon, one of the opponents, said people were
afraid because so many saw the priesting of woman as the culmination of
a departure from scripture and tradition.
''They fear the opening of the floodgates to militant feminism, an
even greater acceptance of deviant sexual practices, contempt for family
life, alteration of creeds, trendy liturgies, and all manner of strange
and erroneous doctrines.''
The Right Rev. Bruce Cameron, Bishop of Aberdeen and Orkney, asked
members to live together as a Church with a diversity of view and
practice.
''The alternative,'' he said, ''would lock this Church over the next
few years into an increasingly polarised and sterile existence which
would be detrimental to our life and mission''.
Canon Kenyon Wright, Glencarse, said the barrier to women being
priests was irrational, unbiblical, and debilitating to the Church's
life and witness. He suggested onlookers must see this soul-searching as
''a storm in a chalice''.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article