CHARLES McGregor killed his prostitute wife after sending her out to
get money for drugs, it was claimed yesterday.
Then he dumped 26-year-old Karen McGregor's body in a car park and
tried to make it look as though she had been murdered by a client.
This was alleged at the High Court in Glasgow by Mr William Totten,
prosecuting.
Mr Totten was making his closing speech to the jury at the trial of Mr
McGregor, 29, who denies assaulting Karen in their home at Maukinfauld
Road, Tollcross, Glasgow, on April 18 last.
Mr McGregor denies punching her, striking her with a hard object,
compressing her throat and murdering her and previously evincing malice
and ill-will towards her.
He also denies concealing her body in a car park at Glasgow's Scottish
Exhibition and Conference Centre and attempting to defeat the ends of
justice.
Mr Totten said the Crown case was that there was disagreement between
the accused and his wife on Saturday, April 17 last, and she went out to
work as a prostitute to get money for drugs.
He added that Karen met her death when she returned home early on the
Sunday morning.
Mr Totten said that after killing his wife, McGregor tried to make it
look as if she had been murdered by a client. He added that there were
similarities between the murder of Karen and the unsolved murder of
another prostitute, 23-year-old Diane McInally, whose body was found in
Glasgow's Pollok Park earlier.
Mr Totten said Karen was left in bushes and was wearing only a choker
and tights which contained #73 in the left sole.
He said part of the choker was found 50 yards from her body and she
had been dragged through bushes.
Mr Totten then asked why the killer had not carried Karen's body l0
yards to the River Clyde and thrown it into the water.
He said the answer was that Mr McGregor had to make it look as though
his wife had been killed by a client, and he got away with it for six
months until his arrest.
Mr Totten also referred to Mr McGregor being seen at his wife's
graveside saying: ''I'm sorry, I didn't mean it.''
He said the jury could take it that he meant, ''I didn't mean to kill
you''. Mr Totten asked the jury to the evidence of witness Mr Joseph
McGinty, 21, a self-confessed drug addict.
Mr McGinty had said early that Sunday morning, after another witness,
Mr Samuel Main, 21, called to see him, he went to the accused's house.
He did not see Mr McGregor but claimed Karen was lying on a couch dead
and with face injuries.
Mr Ian Hamilton, QC, defending, asked the jury to disregard the
evidence of Mr McGinty. He added that without Mr McGinty's evidence the
Crown had no case.
The counsel said that in October, six months after the murder, Mr
McGinty had been arrested on other matters. He had used his fertile
imagination to make up lies about the ''celebrated and unsolved murder
of Karen'' in order to do a deal with the police and get out of custody.
Mr Hamilton also referred to what Mr McGregor was heard saying at
Karen's graveside and told the jury the accused had said a lot at his
wife's grave and it could have meant anything when he said, ''I did not
mean it''.
Mr Hamilton rejected the Crown's submission that the accused had
killed his wife and tried to make it look like a client had killed her.
He said the Crown had submitted that Mr McGregor had sent Karen out to
get money for drugs and killed her on her return. Mr Hamilton said it
was incredible a drug-crazed wretch would have thought up such a plot.
He asked the jury if they thought this drug-crazed man would have
taken his wife's body to the car park, left her with #73 in her stocking
and made it look similar to the murder of Diane McInally.
described Mr McGinty as a liar.
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article