IN subverting the exploitative nature of the pornography industry -- a
business founded on the supposed pre-eminence of male desire and the
subjection of all women -- you might suppose an explicit talk-in (with
slides) by a female ex-porno movie star would court prurience.
Actually, last night's show, the first of three given by Ms Sprinkle
as the latest instalment in the Centre for Contemporary Art's Bad Girls
season, was too human, too frank, too generous, and occasionally too
daftly American to be anything more than thought-provoking. Cheap
arousal on the plane of the physical? Sorry, bub. Honesty is the price
of admission; men in dirty macs can't afford it.
Annie's honesty extends to employing a gynaecological speculum and a
flashlight and inviting strangers to peer in at her cervix. ''Wow,''
said a woman in the audience. One man was unimpressed. ''Licked-over
lunch,'' he said, wrinkling with distaste.
''You don't like it? This is where you're from!'' Annie said. We
laughed. Annie continued her blame-free philosophy, to wit: sex
liberates and can earn you money; the whole world can be bound together
in a chain of pleasure; seek self-awareness; open your heart; expect
nothing; kneel before the sacred prostitutes of ancient Mesopotamia . .
. OK, it got sillier.
Most daring moment? The (female) Sunday newspaper writer who stepped
up at half-time to be Polaroid-snapped with Annie's voluminous breasts
framing her face (only #3.50). It'll make an arresting picture by-line.
How was it for me? Uh, nice. But not quite as good as it seemed to be
for Annie, who wound up naked and orgasmic. American women are a fifth
gender. Who said that? Dunno. Whoever it was, they meant Annie Sprinkle.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article