THE murders of Susan Maxwell, Caroline Hogg, and Sarah Harper showed
striking similarities, the jury in the Robert Black case was told
yesterday.
All three were abducted and their bodies were found dumped long
distances from their homes.
The prosecution also asserted that their murders had striking
similarities to a later kidnapping at a Scottish Borders village --
which Mr Black, 46, had admitted.
Mrs Jackie Harper, Sarah's mother, left the court in tears as the
details unfolded.
Mr Black, stocky, blunt-faced, and almost bald, heard Crown counsel
John Milford, QC, claim in his opening address to the jury in Moot Hall,
Newcastle, that all the murders been carried out by him.
Sitting about four feet from Mr Milford, Mr Black, lightly bearded and
wearing a grey suit, often looked at his accuser but remained impassive.
Earlier in a strong, slightly Scottish, accent he had pled not guilty
to 10 charges -- kidnapping, murdering, and preventing burial of Susan
Maxwell in 1982, Caroline Hogg in 1983, and Sarah Jayne Harper in 1986,
and kidnapping Teresa Ann Thornhill in Nottingham in 1988.
Mr Milford told the jury in the packed courtroom that the victims,
obviously taken for sexual gratification, had ''vanished into thin air''
as Mr Black snatched them while making deliveries between London and
Scotland.
The trial, before Mr Justice Macpherson and a jury of six men and six
women, is expected to last three months.
In the Crown's opening statement Mr Milford outlined the disappearance
of Susan, 11, in July, 1982, as she walked back to her home in Cornhill
on Tweed after playing tennis with a friend at Coldstream on the
Scottish side of the river. It was the first time she had been allowed
to walk home alone, he said. It had been a lovely summer day.
Mr Milford said: ''Down the road she walked, across the bridge which
is the Border. She was dressed in a yellow terry towelling shirt and
shorts, white ankle socks, and tennis shoes.
''She was carrying her tennis racket which she swung as she walked, a
tennis ball, and a children's flask which had contained orange juice.
Across the bridge she walked not many yards into England and then she
disappeared as if into thin air.''
Susan was a bright, friendly, and cautious child who was a Girl Guide,
was in the school tennis team and who had a dog called Peanuts.
Thirteen days later, Mr Milford continued, her decomposing remains had
been found 140 miles away on the A518 Stafford to Uttoxeter Road in
Staffordshire.
Many of the jury might be familiar with the names of the dead
children, he said, and for a child to be taken away and murdered was
every parent's nightmare.
''It is perhaps too easy to dwell on the suffering that there must
have been for the children themselves and of those who loved them. But
our respective jobs demand that we put to one side these emotions that
are generated by a case such as this and consider only and without
passion the central issue -- is it proved by the evidence that it was
this defendant, Robert Black, who abducted these little girls and killed
them and abducted the little girl called Teresa Ann Thornhill in
Nottingham?'' he said.
Turning to the Caroline Hogg case, Mr Milford said it had again been a
hot day almost exactly a year later and it was again at the end of the
week.
Caroline, five, had disappeared beteen seven and eight while she was
out to play near her home in Portobello.
Her remains were found 12 days later at a lay-by in the A444 near
Tycross, Leicestershire, 368 miles from Portobello and 24 miles from the
lay-by where Susan had been found the year before.
Sarah Jayne Harper was 10 years of age. She disappeared just after 8pm
on March 26, 1986, as she walked home from a corner shop near her home
at Morley, Leeds.
Her body was found in the river Trent in Nottinghamshire and, said Mr
Milford, they would submit to the jury that her body had been put in the
river system near to junction 24 on the M1 motorway.
The bodies of the first two children had been too badly decomposed to
establish cause of death but the third child had been drowned. She had
head and neck injuries consistent with forcible abduction and these
suggested she had been unconcious when she was put into the water.
There were a number of common factors, he said. Each victim was a
pre-pubescent female child, each victim was abducted from a public
place, and in each case a vehicle must have been nearby to carry the
child away and conceal her because in each case there had been prompt
searches.
Each victim was abducted for sexual gratification. Each had had her
shoes removed and none of the shoes had been found. Each victim had been
taken south a considerable distance.
None of the victims had suffered any gross injuries such as broken
bones. No serious attempts had been made to conceal the bodies by
burial. Each of the young girls had at the time of abduction had bare
legs, save for white socks.
The events were in themselves unusual, Mr Milford said. Another
unusual factor was the long distances the children had been transported
after abduction. All had been transported from north to south and all
had been taken to the Midlands.
''The resting places of their bodies form the points of a triangle,''
he said.
''It has become known to those investigating this case as the Midlands
Triangle. One of the villages in that triangle is Donnisthorpe. You may
never have heard of it but we shall be returning to it because it is of
particular significance in this case.''
Mr Milford went on to say that July and heat were also important
themes in the case. In the Maxwell and Hogg cases children had been
bathing close by the point of abduction.
In the Maxwell and Harper cases a Transit-type van was seen. The three
events were so unusual, the points of similarity so enormous that it was
submitted that the jury could safely conclude that they were the work of
one person.
The cases, he said, had been subjected to enormous investigations and
eventually, after years had passed, Robert Black had emerged as a
suspect.
Mr Milford then outlined in detail the kidnapping of a child in a
Scottish Borders village three years ago.
Again, said Mr Milford, it was in July when the child was snatched and
Mr Black had once again been heading south when ''by good fortune he had
actually been spotted by someone actually snatching the child and his
van was stopped and he was arrested''.
Mr Black had been born and brought up in Scotland but had moved to
London about 1969. He was a van driver for a poster despatch company,
PDS, and it was his job to deliver posters in England and Scotland.
The jury heard that Mr Black frequently slept overnight in his van in
lay-bys. He lived in London with a family called Rayson -- whose son,
whom Mr Black visited regularly, lived at Donnisthorpe in the Midlands.
''At last good fortune smiled upon the detectives,'' said Mr Milford.
They had been able to plot where Mr Black had been on the days when
the children had gone missing by tracing where Mr Black had bought fuel
with his firm's BP credit card.
''The records going back to 1982 in some instances were still in
existence and so the detectives were able to see where on certain days,
as he went about on deliveries, he had refuelled his vehicle. More than
that, they were able to fill in the gaps by going to various companies
and they were able to say where it was he has delivering posters so that
a picture could be built up of him setting out from London and coming
back.
''Where was he on July 30, 1982 when Susan Maxwell went missing in
Coldstream? I will tell you. He was refuelling a van in Stamington, just
south of the Border, while on his way to Edinburgh and had he taken the
most direct route from there to Edinburgh, the A697, it would have taken
him through Coldstream and past the very place from where the child
disappeared.
''And where was he on July 8 the following year when Caroline Hogg
went missing in Portobello? He was delivering posters that day at
Portobello. On both of these days he was delivering on what was known to
his employers as the Scottish run and to return to his base in London he
would have to pass through the Midlands.
''Where was he on March 26, 1968, when Sarah Harper went missing in
Morley? He was delivering posters about 150 yards away.''
Mr Milford outlined in great detail the kidnapping in the Scottish
Borders village and drew similarities between that and the other three
cases.
He is expected to conclude the Crown's opening statement today when
the jury will be addressed by Mr Ronald Thwaites, QC for the defence,
before evidence starts.
The charges
THE full list of charges to which Robert Black has pled not guilty is
as follows:
1, That on July 30, 1982, at Cornhill on Tweed in the county of
Northumberland he did unlawfully and by force or fraud kidnap Suzanne
Claire Maxwell against her will.
2, Between July 29, 1982 and August 13, 1982, at or near Loxley,
Uttoxeter, Staffordshire, or elsewhere in England and Wales, did murder
Suzanne Claire Maxwell.
3, Between July 29, 1982, and August 13, 1982, at or near Loxley,
Uttoxeter, without lawful excuse prevented the proper burial of a dead
body, namely that of Suzanne Claire Maxwell.
4, Between July 7 and 19, 1983, at various places in England and
Wales, did unlawfully and injuriously falsely imprison Caroline Hogg and
detain her against her will.
5, Between July 7 and 19, 1983, at or near Twycross, Leicestershire,
or elsewhere in England and Wales, did murder Caroline Hogg.
6, Between July 7 and 19, 1983, at or near Twycross, Leicestershire,
without lawful excuse did prevent the proper burial of a dead body,
namely that of Caroline Hogg.
7, On March 26, 1986, at Morley, West Yorkshire, unlawfully and by
force or by fraud did take or carry away Sarah Jayne Harper against her
will.
8, Between March 25, 1986, and April 20, 1986, at or near Ratcliffe
on Soar, Nottinghamshire, or elsewhere in England and Wales, did murder
Sarah Jayne Harper.
9, Between March 28, 1986, and April 20, 1986, at or near Ratcliffe on
Soar, Nottinghamshire, or elsewhere without lawful excuse, did prevent
the proper burial of a dead body namely that of Sarah Jayne Harper.
10, On April 24, 1988, at Radford, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, did
kidnap Teresa Ann Thornhill against her will.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article