Clare Henry explains how the organisers of a Stanley Spencer
exhibition got it totally wrong
STANLEY SPENCER must be spinning in his grave. Not only does Glasgow's
Kelvingrove exhibition, Canvassing The Clyde: Spencer and the Shipyard,
insult and trivialise this great painter via an over-elaborate
pantomime-stage-set display which makes it well-nigh impossible to see
the work; it goes on to denigrate him as an artist. It is without doubt
the most unsympathetic presentation of any artist I have ever seen.
Deconstruction is currently all the fashion in the arts, especially in
literature, philosophy, and painting, so now it's Spencer-bashing with a
vengeance. Instead of praise and appreciation for one of Europe's finest
draughtsmen and most profoundly imaginative painters, there are
nitpicking complaints and misguided criticism. Spencer is said to be
''technically inaccurate'' because he gave his burners only one cylinder
and let his welder hold the rod in his hand. Worse, he eschewed serious
issues like strikes and sectarianism; used a ''worm's-eye view''
unsuited to towering cranes; and overall ''did not so much ignore the
shipyards as try to imagine they were something else''.
What rubbish. Are the organisers blind? Have they never heard of
artistic licence? They miss the point altogether. When Spencer was
commissioned to paint Lithgow's for the War Artists' Advisory Committee
in 1940-46 he did not plan a mundane, pedestrian, exact copy of the
shipyards. Photography can do that. His gift lies in interpretation; in
melding spit and spirit; reality and reverence.
He was impressed by the people, their humanity, strength, humour, and
compassion. He admired the physical activity; the sheer hard work -- but
also saw its beauty: in the sculpture of welding masks, pipes, or
furnaces, the patterns made by ropes or templates, and in the spirit of
the workers.
Riveters and burners are encircled with metal as if metaphorically
implying their absorption in the job. ''Each man seems wedded or welded
to the part of the ship he makes . . . the Burners are youths of 16-20
who draw chalk lines on sheets of steel with an assurance that tells me
what artists they could be.'' In actual fact Spencer's delineation of
each job is more detailed than was required.
Spencer's aim was to present the totality of the Clyde, its ''hallowed
effect'' via metaphor and allegory. This he did brilliantly. If his
labourers carrying steel sheets look a bit like angels surely this was
apt. During the war many saw Clydesiders as angels of mercy building
serviceable merchant ships to serve the Allies and beat the enemy.
Spencer's work is heroic, quirky, moving, thrilling. Each Black Squad
trade is captured in elegant line. His dramatic oils exploit the
chiaroscuro light and shade of fiery furnaces, molten metal, white-hot
oxy-acetylene torches and glinting goggles. He may have been a ''scared
wee man, very small'' looking like a tramp whose clothes didn't fit, but
his Clydeside series immortalises a great era with feeling, dignity, and
humanity, celebrating shipbuilding in a marvellous way. It is wrong to
do him, or it, down. For the exhibition also patronises Glasgow and its
past. ''The Clyde shipyard's mammoth effort now seems a tragic waste of
human energy and resources,'' we are told. Moreover shipbuilders, who
produced the greatest tonnage in Britain during that period, deserve
better than this grotesque, strident peacock blue and red rust
second-class window display of a few chains, thin metal grids, cheap
rough raw wood, dim orange lights, hammers, photographs, and old
bowler-hats. Even Harvey Nichols would have done it better -- and
perhaps more securely. Heaven knows what the health and safety people
think.
Spencer is popularised and patronised in the misguided view -- I
assume -- that it will bring the punters in. Art for the people. Yet is
this really what Glaswegians want? Must they be spoonfed? Are west coast
folk unable to take their art neat?
This Port Glasgow series is strong, important work, able to stand on
its own. It doesn't need theatrical props or contextualising via social
history. If you need documentation for schoolkids, that's fine. But put
it in a separate space. Two shows in one may be economical but it's also
self-defeating.
All but two of the 55 works belong to London's Imperial War Museum.
This is the last occasion they will come to Glasgow, so curator Angela
Weight told me. ''They are destined for the new permanent Imperial War
Museum of the North at Hartlepool. They toured to Third Eye in 1975 but
I felt they should be seen in Glasgow one last time.''
She is no doubt regretting her generosity, given the treatment meted
out to them at the hands of Glasgow Art Gallery. At least you could
study and enjoy these wonderful works at Third Eye where they were
perfectly displayed minus distractions. Now even Spencer fans will find
it hard to focus on his work, lost as it is amid ungainly clutter and
unnecessary staging. Sad.
Canvassing the Clyde is sponsored by The Post Office and is at Glasgow
Art Gallery and Museum, Kelvingrove to August 7.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article