THE Department of Trade and Industry's report on the sinking of the
trawler Antares by a Royal Navy nuclear submarine in the Clyde will
today make eight recommendations aimed at avoiding a repeat of the
tragedy which cost four fishermen's lives.
While the report confirms that the Navy was responsible for the
tragedy, it also says it is ''essential'' to ensure that all fishing
vessels are equipped with VHF radio equipment, and that crews maintain a
continuous listening watch in the interests of their own safety.
The findings of the independent inquiry by the DTI's Marine Accident
Investigation Branch largely mirror those already reached by both the
Navy's own internal inquiry, and the fatal accident inquiry at Paisley
which followed the sinking in November, 1990.
All three blame human error aboard HMS Trenchant, a hunter-killer
submarine which was being used to test a potential nuclear boat
commander when the accident occurred. The DTI describes this as ''a
partial breakdown in both the structure and standards of watchkeeping''
following the completion of a command course.
Most of the report's recommendations have already been implemented in
full or in part by the Navy, although three are still under discussion.
The recommendations are:
* Extending the notification scheme already in force in the Clyde to
warn fishermen of the areas and times of planned submarine activity to
all UK submarine exercise grounds;
* Policing exercise areas with naval surface vessels to ensure
adequate warning for fishing boats which have not heard or heeded
warnings;
* Compelling submarines not on exercise to travel on the surface in
known fishing grounds;
* Extending the minimum safety distance between submarines and other
vessels to 4000 yards, allowing for the safety of navigation of the
submarine and the extent of towed fishing gear;
* Impressing on submarine commanders the need to stick to reporting
facts and not inferences when incidents occur;
* That the Defence Ministry should carry out a thorough review of its
instructions for commanders to ensure that the lessons of the Antares
incident are known to all submariners;
* That submarine exercise areas should be reduced to the minimum
consistent with training needs;
* And that fishermen should be made aware of the consequences of not
maintaining a continuous VHF radio watch as recommended by the
Admiralty.
The Navy's main reservations are understood to be the need for
submarines, for operational reasons, to retain the right to exit their
bases submerged in certain circumstances, and the fact that
concentrating all submarine exercises in fewer areas might actually
increase the risk of collisions.
The report says HMS Trenchant was to blame for compiling an inaccurate
picture of the Antares's position and course in the Sound of Bute, and
is critical of ''inadequate'' attempts to contact other fishing vessels
in the area after the incident.
It also highlights the fact that the relay of ''inaccurate
information'' to the Faslane base operations room led to a delay of more
than eight hours in mounting a search and rescue operation and ''could
have contributed to the loss of life'', although there is no evidence
that any of the trawler's crew reached the surface alive.
It goes on to recommend that fishing vessels be compelled to stow
lifesaving equipment properly, and to ensure that it is maintained ''in
good order'' and ready for release in the event of a collision leading
to the sinking of the vessel.
The Defence Ministry has already earmarked #500,000 to provide
acoustic ''pingers'' to be fitted to fishing nets in the Clyde from next
year as part of an 18-month experiment to find ways of improving safety.
But neither the Navy nor the fishermen are convinced that the scheme
is practical or of any value. A concentration of trawlers equipped with
the devices would be likely to create ''a wall of noise'' which might
confuse sonar operators on a submerged submarine and make it impossible
to distinguish one contact from another.
The report welcomes the fact that the Navy has already undertaken a
review of its own command and control arrangements during submarine
courses, and therefore makes no recommendations on that issue.
Since the Antares incident, submarine exercises have been reduced by
about one-third at times when fishing is permitted, and all potential
nuclear submarine commanders must spend a day at sea in a fishing vessel
to improve their knowledge of the fishermen's problems.
A Clyde ''hotline'' has also been established to give fishermen a
direct link with submarine operations staff at Faslane, and there are
regular consultations between the Navy and trawlermen.
Advance warning of submerged submarine activity is already being
given, and now covers all of the exercise areas in the Clyde within the
UK 12-mile limit. A further expansion of the scheme is under discussion.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article