THE Paragon ensemble fielded a front rank group of strings and
percussion (mostly Royal SNO and BBC SSO players) yesterday in a
powerful concert, the third in the two-day Academy Now! festival. And a
good, big house turned out to hear them.
Conducted by David Davies, and with Paragon in scorching form, the
predominant accent in this concert was on drama. The proceedings erupted
with Lyell Cresswell's Pumpkin Massacre, sheer instrumental drama
launched on a sea of seething, trilling strings.
Full of splintering accents, jagged thrusts, frantic activity, and
with the momentum of a juggernaut, Cresswell's piece, based on an
incident in Maori history, was reminiscent, in its explosive effect, of
Penderecki's Hiroshima Threnody. Superb stuff.
At the other end of the programme was an altogether different kind of
drama with Thomas Wilson's Missa pro Mundo Conturbato. Steeped in
austerity, even in its more extrovert moments, this solemn, concerned
setting of the Mass is as urgently relevant a comment today as it was a
quarter of a century ago.
Its message was delivered with a raw power by the student voices of
Academy Now!, understandably stronger in ensemble than individually.
A student premiere, Is it Me, or the Basilica, by Cluny Strachan,
formed the centrepiece. Some highly attractive ideas were laced through
the work -- a slow Scottish air, treated in rather a MacMillan-like
manner, and an impassioned, long-limbed melody -- but the piece sprawled
rather, lacking overall shape and direction.
Still, the main point here is that young composers like Strachan are
being given the resources to write and hear their music. Experience will
control development.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article