AN inquiry team looking into the cause of the Newton rail crash
yesterday retraced the routes of the trains involved in the crash.
The solicitors and advocates taking part in the inquiry convened in
the front carriage of a ScotRail train with Sheriff Brian Lockhart.
The 23-strong party, without their traditional wigs and gowns, met on
a low-level platform at Glasgow's Central station to reconstruct the
journey.
The trains, driven by Mr David Scott and Mr Reg McEwan, collided in
July 1991 on a single track section of line outside Newton station,
killing four people and injuring 22.
The pomp and ceremony of the proceedings, normally held at Glasgow
Sheriff Court, were waived as the team waited for the Newton special --
an antique train brought specially into service to allow them a driver's
eye view of the crash scene.
There was a respectful silence as the train set off on the route taken
by Mr Scott, who was driving the Balloch to Motherwell train on the
night of the accident.
It was interrupted only by the BR inquiry chief, Mr Vic Gilchrist, who
took up a running commentary outside Cambuslang station.
Each signal and section of track were graphically described as the
train proceeded slowly to the crash site. There was silence as the train
passed over the set of points where the two trains collided head-on.
The commentary was resumed as the train passed through Newton station
and the Turnback Sidings, where Mr McEwan's train was held immediately
before the collision.
At Motherwell, the party were bussed to the signalling centre which
controlled the new #5m junction layout at Newton.
They were shown the panel at which the signalman, Mr Edward Dillon,
set the courses for the trains on the night of the accident, and the
restroom where he was making tea moments before the crash.
The intricacies of signalling procedures, which the team had followed
on photographs and diagrams in court for more than two weeks, were
explained to them on site.
Later, as they passed the scene of the crash again, Sheriff Lockhart
called the train to a halt to allow the court to see for itself the
point of impact.
Mr Gilchrist pointed out the railside section of fencing which had
been renewed after the trains ploughed through it.
It was one of the highest speed collisions ever in the history of BR
operations. Crash investigator, Mr John Lowis, said the two trains would
have met at between 55 and 70mph.
Other witnesses have described how the trains ''telescoped'' into each
other, making fatalities inevitable.
Back in court, a BR technical expert, Mr Donald Newing, said the
chances of a fault in the failsafe solid-state interlocking system,
which controls signals and points, being responsible for the accident
were several billion to one.
Under the system, which was introduced in the mid-1980s, three
separate processors check each other's calculations before signals
change.
The inquiry continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article