TWO Tayside councillors yesterday began 12-month prison sentences
after their appeals against corruption convictions were thrown out by
the Court of Criminal Appeal.
Raymond Mennie and Robert Pullar, both 43, were both found guilty,
after trial at Perth Sheriff Court last year, of corruptly soliciting
cash as an inducement to support a planning application for a #5m
service complex on the A85 Dundee to Perth Road.
After their conviction the two men spent one night in prison before
being released on bail pending their appeal.
Both men alleged that they had suffered a miscarriage of justice
because one of the jurors was employed as an architectural technician by
a key Crown witness.
Lord Hope, Lord Justice General, who heard the appeal with Lords
Murray and Mayfield, said that, if the information about the juror had
been drawn to the attention of the sheriff at the trial, steps could
have been taken to ensure that the juror did not hear the case. It was
regrettable that those who could have taken objection to the juror were
left in ignorance of the facts until after the trial.
Mennie, of Carberry Crescent, Whitfield, Dundee, and Pullar, of Church
Lane, Methven, Perthshire, both claimed that they did not have to
establish that the juror was in fact biased. It was enough that his
presence had created a suspicion that he was not impartial.
Lord Hope said that when a problem of this kind arose after a trial
had been completed, the question must be whether a miscarriage of
justice had in fact occurred.
Although mistakes might occur which resulted in the presence on a jury
of someone who ought not to have been allowed to serve, that in itself
should not be held to invalidate the verdict returned by the jury as a
whole.
There had been previous cases where a juror had indicated that he knew
someone on the indictment or had a prejudice against the accused. The
courts had held that, in these circumstances, it could not be assumed
that the juror's prejudicial knowledge would have led him to ignore the
evidence and directions of the trial Judge and decide the case in
defiance of his oath.
The same point could be made in this case, and this ground of appeal
must be refused.
The court also rejected claims by the councillors that the verdict
returned by the jury was ambiguous, contradictory, and perverse.
Lord Hope said that the jury had made a number of deletions from the
indictment against the councillors, but, although these were less than
perfect, what was left in the charge was enough to convict for
corruption.
The evidence had shown that the councillors had made it clear they
were willing, if bribed to do so, to use their influence on Tayside
Regional Council's planning committee to assist in the granting of
planning permission.
A Tayside Regional Council spokesman confirmed yesterday that
by-elections would be held in Whitfield-Longhaugh and Strathtay.
These were the wards that were held by Labour councillor Raymond
Mennie and Conservative councillor Robert Pullar.
Mr Bill Derby, leader of the administration at Tayside Regional
Council, said yesterday: ''I know this has been a very difficult time
for both councillors' families and they have been under a tremendous
amount of strain during the past year.
''Today, I will be taking action to start the process for by-elections
in both Whitfield and Strathtay, so that the people in these areas have
an elected voice on Tayside Regional Council as soon as possible.
''In the meantime, constituents in Whitfield can be assured that while
they do not have a regional councillor at this time, our councillors
will be available to help them in any way possible.''
Mr Bruce Mackie, leader of the Conservative group at Tayside Regional
Council, said: ''Our heart is with Bob Pullar's wife and family who have
had to endure many months of uncertainty following a long drawn out
trial and appeal.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article