From Greek goddesses to medieval witches, women have had to fight for
the right to practise medicine
MEDICINE has always been the most powerful force known to man or
woman, the power of life over death. Historically women healers were
regarded as equally effective as men, and certainly emotional factors
were regarded as just as important as physical symptoms. But as men
found that money could be made from healing, women found it more and
more difficult to be accepted in medicine.
Next year the medical school at Edinburgh University will have the
opportunity to celebrate the centenary of the admittance of the first
female medical students. It is an anniversary worth remembering, a hard
battle fought by a handful of stubborn and talented women. Yet the
obstacles and hardships were nothing compared to those that confronted
the equally dedicated women who ministered to the sick for generations.
Elisabeth Brooke, who has worked as a qualified herbalist for 17
years, is convinced that women are still suffering at the hands of
male-dominated health authorities. ''Women, and often their female
patients, come out of conflicts badly because they do not receive the
same support from their profession as their male colleagues.
''Obstetrician Wendy Savage came through her ordeal because of support
from the local community rather than from her male colleagues.
Independent midwives have to battle against male-dominated authorities.
Only a few years ago seven of the 20 registered midwives in London were
subject to disciplinary action. Perhaps there is professional jealousy
and fear of women having too much autonomy and power in a field where
traditional male values hold sway and men make all the decisions.''
In Women Healers Through History (Women's Press, #7.99), Elisabeth
shows that women have always been the most loyal supporters of
traditional gentle holistic attitudes to medicine, acknowledging that
the mind and spirit are as important as the body. We even talk about
''poor souls'' when referring to people who are in poor health.
The importance of myths, legends, and symbols may have been gradually
supplanted by more scientific guides to health but the appreciation of
the importance of the psychology of illness is only now beginning to be
recognised again.
Priestess healers in ancient Egypt wielded tremendous power. Female
obstetricians took care of women in labour; ''women sat on warmed stones
and were given healing massages to ease the pain and relax the uterus.''
Only women treated women's ailments. Priestess healers were responsible
for cultivating the medicinal gardens and preparing remedies in the
pharmacies.
In pre-Christian times there were women medics around the world, in
Islamic countries, in France, in Britain. By the Middle Ages men had
begun to resent women practitioners. The famous school at Salerno in
Italy ''tolerated'' women, the only one during the eleventh century even
to do that.
THE few women's voices that have been recorded for history, like the
famous Hildegard of Bingen, were not only strong characters of great
intellectual stature, and of course noble birth, but had to be
acceptable to the Church. ''Men in medieval times set about debasing and
belittling the power of women and, backed by the Christian Church,
taught of their inherent wickedness. In order to steal their power the
Church, and that meant men, created a mythology of their sinfulness and
evil intent.''
Now we had witches instead of intuitive healers whose powers were as
much spiritual as medicinal. Four hundred years ago a Scottish
noblewomen, Eufame Macalyne, was burned alive for asking a midwife,
claimed to be a witch, for drugs to ease her labour pains.
Scotland was particularly zealous, the best in Europe, at killing
witches. Four thousand women were killed during the seventeenth and
early eighteenth century according to Norman Nichol's Life In Scotland.
Over the next two centuries women were squeezed out of public life
generally and retreated into midwifery and nursing which were considered
unimportant. ''Registered practitioners were mostly concerned with
blood-letting, whereas unlicensed women healers continued their age-old
traditions of preventive medicine, herbal remedies, and dietary
therapy.''
Male practioners started becoming more involved in midwifery as the
financial rewards became more worthwhile.
It was the dynamism and determination of Victorian women like
Elizabeth Garrett Anderson and the lesser known but more politically
controversial Sophia Jex-Blake that thrust women into the limelight
again. Sophia and her tiny group of students were subjected to continual
abuse, threat of violence, sexual harassments, and obscene letters which
culminated in the famous Riot of Surgeons' Hall in Edinburgh when a mob
tried to stop them entering the extramural classes which they had hoped
would lead to a degree.
Holistic principles are now becoming normal practice and as many women
as men are qualifying as doctors although, as in most areas of society,
they are less likely to attain senior posts. But we have come a long
way.
It is merely a century since an editorial in The Lancet declared:
''Woman as nurse is the natural help of man. Woman as doctor is a
conceit contrary to nature, and doomed to end in disappointment to both
the physician and the sick.''
Opinions have changed about that but even today there are still women
healers practising as they have done for hundreds of years.
Elisabeth met some of them in the last two years when she spent the
most traumatic time of her life researching the new book. Her first
book, A Woman's Book of Herbs, was a success and she decided to travel
and research the new book.
She discovered American Indians still using traditional herbs and
consciousness-raising to cure patients, and Serbian women -- ''only the
post-menopausal women'' -- who calmed patients by performing rituals and
used herbs and nutritional cures to facilitate the healing process.
Eventually she found herself in the Dominican Republic, fell in love
with a local Haitian man, and her world fell apart when he was shot and
killed -- she still does now know why -- by local police. ''Apart from
the actual shock, or maybe because of it, I became quite ill and I don't
think I'd be here if it hadn't been for the support of my lover's family
and friends. Somehow, with an awful lot of help from my friends back
here, the book was finished.''
It is an incredible story, but so is the one she has written. As
Elisabeth says: ''Part of the Indian treatment is to ask the patient why
she or he is sick. As a healer myself I have discovered that most people
know why they are ill -- they just need to be given the opportunity to
think about it.''
Holistic medicine, once thought of as feminine silliness, will have
become the normal approach by the turn of the century, and the history
of the suffragettes of the medical profession reflects the struggle of
the whole women's movements. Let's hope that next year's centenary
celebrations do justice to the memory of the women who simply wanted to
heal the sick.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article