Scottish LibDem leader Tavish Scott proposed the pay cut – intended to help balance the budget during a tight squeeze on public finances – as part of a package of measures that would ensure his party’s support for the minority SNP Government’s budget, which has to be passed by parliament in the New Year.
Using data obtained through freedom of information requests, the LibDems have calculated that the bill for senior Scottish public sector workers taking home more than £80,000 per year
is £600m.
A 5% pay cut for the highest-paid staff in health boards, councils, universities, government agencies and quangos would save £30m, the party estimates.
Mr Scott said he wanted to see the Government look at this kind of top-slicing proposal to make sure people on the bottom of the public-sector pay grade are protected from cuts.
“We’re asking the Government to look at the overall public-sector pay bill in Scotland and take out 5% across that pay bill at the very top, in other words, on people earning more than £100,000, so that we can protect people at the bottom and also help with the overall pressure the finances of the public sector are under.”
Yesterday Mr Swinney said he was “considering” the matter that had been raised in budget talks with LibDem negotiator Jeremy Purvis.
Neither party would discuss details of other measures that they are discussing.
Mr Scott said there were 1200 people in the NHS alone earning more than £100,000 and his proposals would go even further than in England and Wales, which will see a 1% cap on pay rises for public-sector workers.
Mr Swinney said Scottish Ministers have already set an example by taking a pay freeze, which will also apply to senior civil servants, and the Cabinet has already agreed to extend that approach to the highest paid people across the public sector who come under the government’s remit.
“I will be reporting back to Cabinet, and further announcements will follow in due course,” said Mr Swinney.
“LibDem Westminster policy actually advocates a pay freeze for all employees in the public sector – including nurses and others – whereas we believe in protecting the position of the low paid.
“It is the highest paid who must shoulder the biggest burden.”
Scottish Labour’s Shadow Finance Secretary Andy Kerr cast doubt on how the LibDem plan would be imposed on senior public-sector workers in practice.
He maintained that measures to stimulate the economy were what his party would be demanding from the
budget. “We certainly also called for a pay freeze on the highest earners, but I’m not sure that’s the top of my list of priorities,” said Mr Kerr.
Labour is still furious over the cancellation of the Glasgow Airport Rail Link and will campaign for the £182bn project to be reinstated.
Ministers cancelled the airport rail link citing Westminster-imposed cuts to its budget, but Labour insist the level of cash is actually rising while the SNP maintain there will be £814m less to spend.
“A primary school pupil can tell Mr Salmond he’s got his sums wrong over the budget,” said Mr Kerr.
“The facts speak for themselves as official Scottish government figures show the budget for 2010-11 is £35.49bn. The 2009-10 budget is £34.57bn. That is almost £1bn more, and Scotland’s biggest ever budget.
“I’ll even lend Alex Salmond my calculator if he cannot do the arithmetic. But the SNP think if they repeat a lie often enough people will believe them.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article