That statement has been backed by the former manager, who said: “No, it wasn’t to do with the Kevin Kyle incident. We had a chat and Billy and I felt it was the right time to move on and give the club a fresh start. Sometimes you go through life and you disagree on things but that’s football. We’ve come to a stage where it’s best for all parties that we move on.”
Jefferies had been linked with the Dundee United job – although it is understood that he will not be considered – and has also been tipped as a potential candidate for the Motherwell position.
While he insisted that was nothing but speculation, the 59-year-old admits he is keen to seek employment as soon as possible: “Breaks depend on whether you get offers for jobs,” he said. “I’ve still got a hunger for the job and for a different challenge. I just have to wait and see if that comes along. If not, I’ll enjoy a wee break.”
Meanwhile, Johnston has told fans they face a wait to learn who will replace Jefferies. “We are not planning to make a full-time appointment any time soon,” he said. “We are going to take time and look at the options. We will make interim arrangements.”
Asked about his own future, Johnston added: “I don’t know whether I will stay long-term or not. This is my fifth season as chairman and what I’ve been trying to do is reduce the debt. We have managed to do that, we have knocked £1.5m off the core debt.
“We will keep battling away and until some multi-millionaire comes along and is willing to splash money, I will continue to do the best I can to keep the business going.”
The players will have to do likewise on the pitch, with defender Simon Ford admitting that it is time for the squad to stand up and be counted after winning just three matches in the opening half of the season.
“The manager can only do so much,” Ford admitted. “We’ve not being doing it on the pitch. Our job now is to keep Kilmarnock in the SPL and prove to everyone that we are good players.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article