Bruce McKain talks to an author who believes he has solved the mystery
who really murdered Marion Gilchrist in 1908
MORE than 80 years after the brutal murder of 82-year-old Marion
Gilchrist the case of Oscar Slater retains its fascination as one of the
great unsolved mysteries and major scandals in Scottish legal history.
Slater's fate is a sobering reminder that miscarriages of justice are
by no means a recent phenomenon nor confined to the English legal
system.
It has long been accepted that Slater was not the real murderer, and
for many years suspicion has centred on Dr Francis Charteris, a relative
of the elderly victim. Charteris died in 1964 after a distinguished
career as Professor of Medicine at St Andrews University.
Now a former history teacher and Hong Kong policeman has written a
book, confidently entitled Oscar Slater: The Mystery Solved, revealing
in print for the first time the name of the man the author is convinced
is the real killer.
Thomas Toughill also alleges that Slater was the victim not of a
simple miscarriage of justice but of a conspiracy which extended to the
highest levels of the legal system.
He claims that the prosecuting authorities hoped and expected that
proceedings to extradite Slater from America would fail. Unfortunately
Slater ruined the master-plan by volunteering to come back, certain that
a fair trial would clear his name. His faith in the system was sadly
misplaced and he was sentenced to death, saved from the rope only by a
last-minute reprieve.
Slater was pardoned on the extraordinary condition that he spend the
rest of his life in prison. The Government broke the terms of the pardon
by freeing Slater after he had spent 18 years in Peterhead, then passed
an Act of Parliament to allow him to appeal (successfully) against his
conviction.
Mr Toughill, who is now looking for a publisher for his book, grew up
in Glasgow in the late 1950s and the 60s when memories of the case were
still strong. ''I thought it was probably the greatest Scottish murder
mystery this century, let's have a crack at solving it. I believe I've
done that.'' At this stage he does not wish to jeopardise the chances of
publication by revealing the name of the killer but is certain that his
researches have unlocked the key to the mystery.
''Dr Charteris was suspected for many years of being the murderer but
although he was involved he was not the man who bludgeoned Miss
Gilchrist to death in her Glasgow flat in December 1908.'' Mr Toughill
is certain that the murder arose out of a family dispute over Miss
Gilchrist's estate. Charteris was related to Miss Gilchrist's niece and
she was originally the heir to the old lady's #80,000 fortune.
Towards the end of 1908 Miss Gilchrist, who had no love for the
Charteris family, apparently changed her mind and decided to leave the
great bulk of her money to a family called Ferguson, whose mother had at
one time been her maid. ''There's no doubt that the whole reason for
getting into that flat was to get hold of the will or a document,'' says
Thomas Toughill. ''Time was urgent because Miss Gilchrist was dying from
chronic kidney failure. Charteris was a doctor and may well have known
this.''
Mr Toughill believes that Charteris was in Miss Gilchrist's flat with
the killer and was seen leaving by Helen Lambie, the old woman's maid.
He is also sure that Francis's brother, Archibald Hamilton Charteris,
was waiting outside.
The official version is that Slater came to the attention of the
Glasgow police on Christmas Day 1908, four days after the murder, but Mr
Toughill has no doubt that this is a ''pack of lies''. ''Oscar Slater, a
German Jew, was already known to the police as a pimp and a shady
character. Slater himself claimed that the police had been keeping his
flat under surveillance and that they in fact watched him leave Glasgow
on his way to America.'' This was portrayed as a flight from justice but
Slater had already made plans to leave Scotland for reasons unconnected
with the murder.
Thomas Toughill thinks the police knew the identity of the real killer
within hours and that like the Charteris brothers, he was protected by
the authorities.
''Someone in the case pointed out the physical resemblance that
existed between Slater and the Charteris brothers, in particular the
curious dip at the bridge of the nose which the three men shared. A plot
was hatched between Procurator-fiscal James Hart and John Ord, head of
the CID, to blame Slater for the murder.
''The Charteris family was very influential. They were personal
friends of Alexander Ure, who, as Lord Advocate, prosecuted the case.
''His performance at the trial was nothing short of disgraceful.
Instead of taking an impartial view he conducted a ferocious assault on
Slater's character. He invented facts and his jury speech was full of
inaccuracies, all to Slater's detriment.
''As far as the extradition proceedings are concerned, the object was
that they would fail. That's why the evidence produced at the
proceedings was so weak. The Americans would never have returned Slater
on the basis of that evidence. Mary Barrowman, a 14-year-old message
girl, gave evidence that Slater merely resembled a man who had run out
of Miss Gilchrist's close on the night of the murder. Helen Lambie said
she did not even see the man's face. She recognised him by his walk.
''Failure to extradite Slater would have been the perfect solution.
The authorities would obviously feign outrage and the Charteris family
would be free to carry on with their lives. Slater spoiled the whole
plan by volunteering to come back. He was outraged at this assault on
his character and after all the hatred that had been whipped up in the
press there was no alternative but to go ahead with the prosecution.
''Helen Lambie and Mary Barrowman were re-programmed and told to
identify Slater as the man, whereas before they had merely said he
resembled the man. In the late 1920s, just around the time that Slater
was released, Mary Barrowman signed a statement stating that she had
been browbeaten by the Procurator-fiscal into changing her evidence.''
Around the same time Helen Lambie was reported to have made a
statement to the Empire News which seemed to point to Francis Charteris,
not Slater, as the man she saw in her mistress's flat on the night of
the murder. Thomas Toughill's book is dedicated to John Thomson Trench,
the Glasgow policeman who tried to bring out the truth about the Slater
case after the conviction.
The author says: ''I don't think Trench realised the extent of the
conspiracy. He never had any chance of winning and was going to be
squashed. That is why he was kicked out of the force and later
prosecuted on a ridiculous trumped-up charge.
''An attempt was made to clear his name in 1969 while his widow was
still alive but that came to nothing because of a lack of evidence. I
don't see how anyone could read this book and conclude that there is no
evidence. Trench was telling the truth. The man who walked aross that
floor was Dr Francis Charteris and Trench was told that by Helen Lambie.
''Obviously I want my book to be published but I would also like to
see justice done. Trench acted out of the highest motives. What he did
was a remarkably courageous thing and his name should now be cleared.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article