THERE was anger last night after Armed Forces Minister Mr Archie
Hamilton announced that no further disciplinary action is to be taken
over the sinking of the trawler Antares by a nuclear submarine.
An MP and a lawyer acting for the family of one of the four men who
died when the fishing boat was dragged under the Firth of Clyde by the
submarine Trenchant accused the Navy of using an officer on a training
course at the time of the tragedy as a scapegoat.
They pointed out that there had been others on board more experienced
than Lieutenant Commander Peter McDonnell who last year was found guilty
of negligence and severely reprimanded by a court-martial as a result of
the incident.
Mr George Foulkes, MP for Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley, who has
campaigned on behalf of the families of the Antares fishermen,
complained about the Navy's training methods and said: ''It is clear
that a junior officer under training, Lt Cdr Peter McDonnell, has been
made the scapegoat in this instance.
''Without any deterrent action by the commander-in-chief and with no
ban on submerged activity in fishing areas, the seas where submarines
operate remain a constant danger for fishermen.''
Mr Foulkes said that he would continue to press the Minister to try to
have the decision reconsidered and that he would intensify his campaign
for a ban on under
water submarine activity in all recognised fishing areas.
Mr Robert Hynd, the solicitor representing the family of the youngest
victim of the tragedy, 20-year-old Dugald Campbell, said: ''This
decision by the Royal Navy confirms that Lt Cdr McDonnell was a
scapegoat. At his court-martial we were told that he had made errors in
underwater navigation techniques and that these errors, for which he was
court-martialled, did not contribute to the loss of the Antares.''
He added: ''At that stage the families asked the legitimate question:
'If his errors did not contribute to the loss of the Antares, whose
did?'
''Today we are still asking the same question. Effectively no-one is
being held responsible for the loss of the Antares.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article