THERE was a time when the Crichton Royal Hospital in Dumfries was the
best of its kind in Europe. Wealthy Victorian families paid to have
their relatives cared for by the most eminent doctors in the land. The
Crichton, funded from one man's private fortune, became an
internationally-acclaimed centre of excellence in caring for the
mentally handicapped and a proud part of the heritage of Dumfries.
Indeed local people developed an amiable relationship with those of
the Crichton's patients -- including some splendid eccentrics -- who
daily visited Dumfries via one of the three leafy roads which led to
town. I suppose in a way it was an early experiment in returning the
mentally ill to the community.
In Dumfries it is still said that anyone not quite normal was ''up the
middle road . . .''
Being thrawn Scots, the good folk of the town were at first hostile to
the idea of a local asylum and quickly adopted the Nimby attitude: there
would be no place for lunatics in their back yard. In a searing
editorial headlined ''Crichton Foolery'' the Dumfries Times remarked in
1834: '' . . . the erection of a public madhouse is a mode of
appropriation which the town and neighbourhood entirely object to as
wasteful and uncalled for.''
It denounced the Crichton family trustees, adding that the asylum
would be ''their own foolery from the foundation to rooftree, theirs
solely and indivisibly and Heaven give them good of it!''
Today it is all rather different. ''Crichton Hospital has a long and
enviable reputation . . . '' said the Dumfries Standard last week
commenting on the latest round of feuding over plans by the local health
board to sell off parcels of the Crichton's peripheral land. To some
this smacks of abusing the town's heritage and selling off the family
silver. To others it is prudent fiscal management.
What is certain is that the debate now raging in Dumfries demonstrates
public sensitivity to the care of the mentally ill. It also shows how
unpopular are the actions of other health boards which, in the best
traditions of Thatcherism, have closed wards, sent home patients, and
made some fast money by turning fine old buildings into blocks of flats.
Indeed, as Morag Williams, archivist of Dumfries and Galloway Health
Board, points out, Mrs Thatcher herself would have been impressed by the
style of Elizabeth Crichton who made certain her husband's bequest was
used to her own satisfaction. Mrs Crichton effectively pioneered private
health care in the south of Scotland by funding the Crichton, whose
history does not always accord with the popular local understanding that
it was a charitable gift, inviolable for all time, to the people of
Dumfries.
Her husband, Dr James Crichton, made his money in India and the Far
East -- some of it from opium dealing, it is said -- and used some of it
to set up home in Friars' Carse, next to Ellisland, where Burns had
farmed a generation earlier. Dr Crichton set aside #100,000 in his will
for charitable purposes.
His widow wanted the money used for a univeristy which, inexplicably,
the south of Scotland lacks to this day. The idea of a Dumfries
University was too much for the four already in existence at that time
and was strangled at birth. Mrs Crichton decided instead to found and
endow ''a lunatic asylum in the neighbourhood of Dumfries upon the most
approved plan and capable of accommodating 100 patients''.
Space was taken in magazines advertising the Crichton Institution for
Lunatics where patients most able to pay could, for 350 shillings a
year, enjoy a private parlour and bedroom, bathroom -- ''elegantly
furnished'' -- where the daily menu would include wine, dessert, game in
season, served on a silver platter. Use of carriage or horse would be
provided daily and the patient/attendant ratio was one to one.
The place quickly became profitable which helped to fund the
charitable aspect of the Crichton. This meant that paupers, or at least
some of them, were also looked after. The penniless, or ''patients of
respectibility in reduced circumstances'', could, for ten or 15
shillings a year, have a private room with an iron bed but no curtains
or carpets; animal soup daily and animal food thrice weekly, and bread
and vegetables.
There would be tea to the females, tobacco and beer to the industrious
males. One keeper would attend 10 patients. Paupers from outside what is
now Dumfries and Galloway region had to pay an extra three shillings a
year.
As the money rolled in the Crichton quickly expanded. At one point in
the middle of this century it covered 1000 beautiful acres containing
some magnificent sandstone Victorian buildings. It even had its own
resplendent church and a huge hall, one of the biggest in the south of
Scotland, which was recently used -- at considerable profit to the board
-- for the Lockerbie fatal accident inquiry.
The Crichton had become a town within a town, a self-contained
community in surroundings more elegant than any other in Scotland, with
patients from all over Britain and beyond.
There is now a price for this institutionalised grace. Today the
Crichton is probably the most expensive hospital to run in Scotland,
perhaps Britain. Most of its wards and offices are in listed buildings
where alterations are often impossible. Heating, lighting, and cleaning
costs are enormous. Much of the land was unused and even the Crichton's
own golf course has potential value far beyond its nine holes in a town
where both the other local clubs have long waiting lists.
When the NHS was introduced in 1948 the Crichton, grounds and all,
were transferred by legislation to the Secretary of State for Scotland.
Any lingering notion that no-one could interfere with the original terms
of the trust seems to have disappeared. ''We have no doubt that what we
are doing is both legally and morraly correct,'' said Mr Michael Cook,
board general manager recently.
The NHS (Scotland) Act of 1947 stated that property transferred to the
Scottish Secretary freed him from any existing trusts. The Act also
states, however, that the Scottish Secretary should, as far as
practicable, secure that the objects for which the property was
previously used were not prejudiced.
Over recent years changes in the treatment of the mentally handicapped
have brought a reduction in patient numbers in the Crichton as
elsewhere, as more and more have been returned to the communities --
sometimes against their own interests.
Up and down the land mental hospitals have used this clearance
programme to sell assets. This has not yet happened in the Crichton but
recent events have set alarm bells ringing.
Some, like Sir Hector Monro, the local Tory MP -- no sympathiser with
those who would sell family silver -- believe there is nothing wrong
with the health board offering land bought in more recent times and
outside what is known as the Crichton's curtilage: in other words the
central area of wards and administration blocks.
''They have made it absolutely clear at two meetings and in writing
that they are not selling anything within the curtilage. They are
offering for sale bits of agricultural land bought in the 1940s for
growing potatoes but they are not touching the curtilage at all. People
are just stirring up a row. When your patient numbers go down from 1250
to 350 you must find a better use for some of the place.''
But there are those who are not impressed. In Dumfries there is
widespread suspicion of the board's motives. Regional Labour councillor
John Dowson says the entire Crichton complex was built from the proceeds
of a charitable trust and should not simply be sold off, even in part.
''We have offered to form a new trust to take it off their hands and run
it as a charity but nothing came of that,'' he says.
''The Crichton should be kept intact. It is part of the heritage of
Dumfries. Selling off bits of it is the thin end of the wedge. We want
at the first hurdle to stop the break-up of the estate for gain.''
According to board officials the money raised from selling or leasing
property will go to caring for the mentally handicapped, not just in the
hospital itself but in the community. Mr Dowson says mental health care
is the Cinderella of the NHS and he worries that income from disposals
will ''just go into the general pot''.
Several Crichton buildings have been leased already to local
businesses including the local enterprise company, tourist board, and
radio station. Mr Dowson says the superb environment of the Crichton
will be spoiled if this process continues. ''We could see the break-up
of the whole estate and in a few years it could become an industrial
estate.''
Mr John Hanlon, director of Nithsdale's Council of Voluntary Service,
says every health board in Britain has been given targets by the
Government for savings and disposals of assets -- ''and the Crichton is
no different''. This is denied by Mr Les Callaghan, official spokesman
for the board, who says the board sets its own targets.
Over the century and a half of the Crichton's existence it received
many gifts and endowments, including some magnificent antique furniture,
much of it from the Crichton family. A visitor wandering through the
cathedral-like buildings, wondering at the ambitions and vision of the
Victorians, occasionally passes tables or sideboards which must be
priceless.
The buzz in Dumfries is that much of this treasure trove has
mysteriously disappeared over the years, including the era before the
health board came into being. Mr Callaghan says: ''We have looked into
this. There is no truth in this. Like any establishment this place loses
things.
''Pilfering takes place. We have taken steps to minimise this. We have
disposed of low-value furniture some of which had developed antique
status. All of our valuable antiques are now bar-coded and checked and
catalogued.''
This story will run. If the Crichton is to lose some of its
surrounding grandeur to commerce or housing the move seems likely to be
met with hostility in Dumfries, despite the board's explanations. It
makes me wonder how vociferous the protests would be if the board went
the way of some of the others and began asset-stripping in earnest.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article