Defence Correspondent
IAN BRUCE on the
implications of the
Antares sinking.
THE Antares sinking was a tragedy which may have been repeated up to
16 times in the last 10 years in the crowded fishing grounds of the
Firth of Clyde and the Irish Sea. But the truth about the fate of the
lost trawlers has gone to the bottom with their crews and may never be
known for sure.
Fishermen at ports along the west coast are willing to ply all who
will listen with tales of hairs-breadth escapes and expensive nets
snagged by prowling submarines and cut adrift to avoid swamping. It is a
story told with monotonous regularity and varying success to insurance
companies.
The only hard facts to emerge from a decade of claim and counter-claim
is that more than 60 men have died in suspicious circumstances, and that
there is enough evidence to have forced the Ministry of Defence to pay
compensation in at least 11 damage cases before the Antares incident.
Until this year, the Royal Navy hid behind a combination of outright
denial of responsibility and the shroud of secrecy surounding operations
in the Clyde. It has never before admitted causing loss of life.
Even at the height of the Cold War, missile boats leaving Faslane or
Holy Loch, the US base, were clearly visible to anyone ashore with a
pair of binoculars. It was a standing joke that the Soviet KGB and its
military intelligence counterpart, the GRU, were the best customers of
the scenic-cottage-for-rent industry on the lower stretches of the
river.
The joint problem for the navy and the Clyde's 150-strong trawler
fleet is that the deep-water trenches running in a horshoe around Arran
from the north are ideal both for submarine activity and for fishing.
The Antares proved beyond doubt that it is a fatal combination.
Further out into the Irish Sea, the problem is complicated by the fact
that British and US submarines are not the only vessels lurking beneath
the waves. Soviet and other Warsaw Pact boats were -- and still are --
regular visitors on the task of trying to detect and follow a Polaris or
Poseidon missile submarine as it leaves the Clyde for patrol duty in the
North Atlantic or the Norwegian Sea.
Despite glasnost and the collapse of the Soviet state, a Russian AGI
-- an intelligence-gathering trawler -- is still more or less a fixture
in the waters off the Scottish coast. Its duties are unchanged. It is
there to monitor the movement of allied submarines and pass that
information to one of its own hunter-killer boats. The strategic game
may have shifted its centre of gravity, but it is still being played.
The navy's concession that it now informs the fishing fleet of
submarine movement areas is a major step forward for an organisation
based on the foundation of total security. It is also a concession which
is effective only as long as the trawler crews pay heed to the warning.
The Antares inquiry findings call for an end to submarine exercises in
the Clyde, and for more stringent safety measures such as a minimum of
1.5 nautical miles' separation between submerged submarines and fishing
vessels on the surface.
The navy has already tightened up its own procedures, and new VHF
transceivers have been fitted to all submarines operating in the area to
enable them to communicate with trawlers.
A Defence Ministry spokesman said yesterday that nothing which might
improve safety and prevent another tragedy would be ruled out, including
the possibility of carrying out exercises elsewhere on the coast away
from the main fishing grounds.
The Ministry has also ordered a #4.5m hi-tech coastal surveillance
system which will result in the construction of three monitoring
stations equipped with radar and electro-optical sensors linked to a
central control point. This will be used for both traffic management on
the river and for search and rescue missions as well as ''deconflicting
fishing vessel and submarine activity''.
There is also talk of supplying ''pingers'' -- electronic sonar
beacons -- for attachment to fishing nets to allow submarines to detect
the presence of trawlers more easily, although the passive sonars in all
ballistic and hunter-killer submarines should already be sufficient to
pinpoint traffic accurately.
The navy is reluctant to talk about anything which impinges on the
security of Polaris missile boats, but the captains of these submarines
have standing orders not to compromise the safety of their vessels even
if an incident involving a trawler occurs.
While a nuclear-powered hunter-killer boat might surface, as in the
case of HMS Trenchant after the Antares sinking, a Polaris submarine
would remain submerged to preserve the secrecy of its own position. That
will not change, no matter what deals or compromises are finally
reached.
In the end, the growing co-operation between fishermen and submariners
can only serve to enhance safety. But the closest links and the finest
technology are always subject to the peril of human error. According to
the bulk of the evidence in the Antares case, it was the human factor,
in combination with circumstance, which cost four men their lives.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article