THE FIRST man to be extradited to the United Kingdom from Ireland
under a new treaty was cleared at the Old Bailey yesterday of plotting
an IRA bombing campaign, then immediately rearrested.
Former IRA bomb maker Desmond Ellis, a Dublin television repair man,
was being held under the Prevention of Terrorism Act.
Mr Ellis, was taken to Paddington Green police station where he was
expected to be served with an exclusion order and put on a flight to
Dublin.
The jury's verdict last night was hailed by 39-year-old Mr Ellis as
not just a victory for the Irish, but for the British people.
In court Mr Ellis had personally demonstrated his appreciation of the
verdict. After the trial Judge had left the court he shouted ''Thank
you'' to the jury.
The jury's decision, after only two hours, was also greeted with
delight by Mr James Noel Ellis, the freed man's father. ''It is a just
verdict,'' he declared.
The prosecution had alleged that, although he never set foot on the
mainland, his fingerprints were found on devices discovered in a cache
of arms near Pangbourne, Berkshire.
It had clear links with a bomb blitz in London in October-November
1981 when four devices exploded and one was made safe, according to the
prosecution. Three people died.
The attacks included one on Irish Guards returning to Chelsea barracks
by coach. Two members of the public were killed and several injured.
Other targets were the Commandant General of the Royal Marines, Sir
Steuart Pringle, whose right leg had to be amputed, and the then
Attorney General Lord Havers.
Another bomb at a Wimpey Bar in Oxford Street blew up, killing
explosives officer Kenneth Howarth.
Mr Ellis admitted during his trial he had worked for the IRA in 1980
in Dublin where he was arrested and jailed for eight years for his
activities.
He had fought the extradition before five Judges in the Supreme Court
in Dublin and lost.
The same Supreme Court will rule shortly on the cases of three other
men who are claiming political motives for terrorist crimes committed in
Northern Ireland. The political loophole has helped dozens to escape
extradition.
Yesterday's verdict might help to restore some confidence in the
British legal system among ordinary Irish citizens, many of whom
believed it would be impossible for an IRA suspect to face a fair trial
in this country.
However, the events surrounding Mr Ellis's case did not help the cause
of extraditing suspected terrorists from Ireland to the UK.
During a hearing before a stipendiary magistrate in England, defence
counsel Mr Geoffrey Robertson said that it had been represented in the
Irish courts that there was evidence Mr Ellis had been in England: this
was false and misleading.
The prosecution conceded then there was no evidence that he had ever
set foot in England before being extradited.
The magistrate refused to commit Mr Ellis on the original charges
under the 1883 Explosive Substances Act, alleging conspiracy in the UK
to cause an explosion and possession of explosives.
Two new charges alleging conspiracy to cause grievous bodily harm by
use of explosive substances and conspiracy to cause criminal damage were
subsituted.
This action ''unwittingly stirred up an international hornet's nest'',
said Mr Robertson.
Under international law, no-one who had been extradited could be tried
for offences other than those on which they had been extradited.
Following protests from Ireland, the prosecution said it would not
proceed on the two substituted charges and the original charges were
reinstated. One was dropped midway through the Old Bailey trial.
The prosecution had argued that physical presence in the UK was not
required to establish liability.
During his Old Bailey trial, Mr Ellis readily admitted he had worked
for the IRA in 1980 in Dublin where he had been arrested and jailed. He
was from a staunch republican family. His grandparents fought in the
1916 Dublin uprising.
His counsel Mr Robertson, told the jury that Mr Ellis had served long
years in prison for aiding the IRA in the 80s. He said the defendant had
been brought back to Britain to be punished again for what he did in
1981.
''No civilised society allows anyone to be punished again for the same
offence,'' the QC said.
Yesterday solicitor Mrs Gareth Pierce said that had Mr Ellis been
aware he was to have been recharged with something he had already been
charged with in Ireland in 1981, it could have been raised at the
extradition proceedings.
''I would think it obvious the whole extradition process should be
looked at again,'' she said.
The Old Bailey jury had heard that Mr Ellis's fingerprints were found
on devices on an IRA arms and explosives cache, discovered by chance by
two forestry workers near Pangbourne.
The Crown alleged that although Mr Ellis had not set foot in the UK,
he was an esential member of the terrorist plot to cause explosions.
''The Crown contend that he was clearly a bomb-maker,'' said Mr David
Jeffreys, QC, prosecuting.
However, throughout the case, Mr Ellis has maintained that he knew
nothing of a terror plot on the mainland.
Mr Ellis told the jury that he had always believed that a bombing
campaign on the mainland was counter productive. He believed that the
devices he worked on in Dublin were meant for Northern Ireland -- he had
no knowledge of the mainland campaign.
Sinn Fein president Gerry Adams said the acquittal underlined the
absurdity of extradition from the Republic. ''Political extradition is a
nonsense which strips Irish citizens of their legal and human rights. It
must stop.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article