Alan Sharp is an accomplished man of letters, a big noise in
Hollywood. But, as TOM SHIELDS finds, you can take the scriptwriter out
of Greenock, but you can't take Greenock out of the scriptwriter
I'm a talented writer. Not
one who ploughs an esoteric
furrow but a mainstream
writer. I just sit down and
get on with the tale
AS A successful man of letters, Alan Sharp is doubly exposed to the
standard Scottish reaction to the boy who has done good. There is no
doubt someone somewhere who will say: ''Alan Sharp? Ah kent baith his
faithers.''
Sharp -- author of a great Scottish novel, A Green Tree in Gedde, and
a top honcho Hollywood scriptwriter -- is the seed of Peter Craig, a
Dundee communist, and the son of Joe Sharp, a Greenock salvationist. It
is, as Sharp says, a genetic web overlaid with a cultural web which he
is unpicking to this day.
But first we fast-forward from an Alyth nursing home where in 1934 a
Dundee lass is giving birth to her second illegitimate child to a
masterclass at the Edinburgh Film Festival in 1992. Sharp is telling his
wee tales to an enraptured audience of mainly young film buffs. Like how
he was called before a studio boss to discuss an African adventure
script which Sharp has begun with a scene where two homosexual Scottish
slave traders are playing badminton on the banks of the Limpopo. The
studio boss just loves Sharp's writing, but could he not make his
characters a bit more cardboard?
Like when he was working with Peter Fonda and couldn't understand a
word the guy was saying until he caught up on the marijuana gap.
Sharp has an easy way with the earnest questions. A young lady takes
Sharp to task on the fact that he professes an anti-violence stance yet
his film Ulzana's Raid showed full-frontal Apache torture and mutilation
while the film The Searchers portrayed the same horror just in John
Wayne's face. ''I guess that's because it was a far better movie,'' says
Sharp. ''The Searchers was the apogee of the gear.''
As a skilled writer of dialogue, how did Sharp cope with writing so
many westerns? ''Well, you just have to get them off their horses and
get them talking.''
Sharp's first western, Billy Two Hats, is shown after the discussion.
It features Gregory Peck as a Scottish character who teams up with a
half-breed Indian. As the two find themselves surrounded by baddies,
Peck has such lines as ''We made a right midden of that'' and ''If your
auntie had a moustache, she'd be your uncle''. You can take the
sceenwriter out of Greenock but you can't take Greenock out of the
screenwriter.
Or, as a young buff puts it, Sharp remains ''remarkably untainted by
Hollywood''. Sharp replies that this is because he was already
well-tainted by Scotland before he went.
While Sharp was back in Scotland for the Edinburgh Film Festival
retrospective of his work, he also completed the first draft of a script
for a film about Rob Roy which Peter Broughan of Bronco Films, Glasgow,
is trying to process through the movie machine. ''Rob Roy,'' says Sharp,
''was just a footnote in Scottish history but he was mixed up with some
heavy dudes.'' He then goes on to summarise a story of political and
economic chicanery in early eighteenth century Scotland involving the
dukes of Montrose and Argyll. As Sharp tells it Rob Roy was a pretty
decent guy whose misfortunes led him into ''outlawry and thievage''.
But in the film process much of this background detail has inevitably
to be lost in favour of action. Fortunately, there was plenty as Rob Roy
escapes from this foe by plunging off his horse into a Highland river or
leaps from a castle turret on to a convenient tree. What we have here is
great potential for a Highland western.
During this return to Scotland, Sharp has spoken so much that when he
is interviewed he says he feels he is playing a worn-out record. It is a
record with many interesting tracks as he fluently addresses such issues
as politics, football, sex, drugs, literature and everything.
Ask him his views of the state of the Scottish nation after the April
general election and his answer begins in Washington DC where the USA is
run by a handful of vested interests and lobbyists within the Parkway
belt, where the exercise of politics is not governance but the retention
of power in a country where 98% of incumbents are re-elected.
Then look at the British system. A televised parliament which ''is
Monty Python before our very eyes''. He says: ''My belief is that before
you can move towards anything like direct democracy you have to work
with smaller constituencies. You cannae do it with 250 million people.
You cannae do it with 50 million people but you can wi five million
people.''
Which brings us to Scotland. ''Units have to be smaller to permit a
more direct democratic process. Scotland was an ideal example. Here was
a country, the only country on the planet that could have its
independence if it wanted without having to fight for it. They will not
send tanks up here. They will do all kinds of other things. And if they
don't send tanks, you will not have to find terrorists to fight them.
You will not have a government that has been born out of warfare and
that's a big plus.''
Sharp takes a pragmatic view of Scotland's historical relationship
with England. ''The Scots are a very interesting mob in as much as they
made a very interesting deal with the English. A sane deal. It had a lot
of problems to it but the alternative was to have these bastards come up
here and kick your arse every 25 years.'' And, he says, the English have
been pretty fair in the sense that they have said: ''Send us your best
and brightest and we'll use them. And they've done it and rewarded them
by making them prime ministers and the rest.
''The relationship the Scots have to the English is a symbiotic one
and giving it up is psychologically very difficult because it's going to
take away your excuse.
''With the English there we can say if it wisnae for them bastards . .
. and I've been watching Scottish fitba long enough to understand the
Scottish psyche and my own. All the Scots need is an excuse.''
And when it comes to excuses after a Tory general election win, the
Scots have a double whammy. We can blame both the English and the
Scottish Labour leaders in whom the voters placed their trust. ''My
question is, did the Scots actually believe they were Scottish? Did they
actually believe all this stuff they say about themselves? A man's a man
for a' that. The rank is but the guinea stamp. Or was it all just a
performance, a fiction with which we maintain ourselves? We all tell
ourselves wee stories like we're good in bed or could have been a good
midfield player. We usually take care not to put ourselves in a
situation where we get called on it.''
If Scotland was too feart to grasp some form of devolution through the
ballot box, perhaps it might be just as well to go further down the road
of Tory victories, with the hardships involved, to reach some other kind
of political solution. It is difficult to make big alterations in a
system just by changing where you hold your parliament.
In global as well as Scottish terms, Sharp is a believer in apocalypse
soon: ''I am a New Ageist. I believe big shit is coming down in a
millennial kinda sense. The truth will set you free but first it will
make you fucking miserable. We are looking at hard times all around.''
This seems as good a point as any to change the subject to the
relatively cheerful subject of the state of Scottish football. Again
Sharp approaches this from a historical perspective.
He loves the game but in the 1974 World Cup in Germany experienced a
pain that was totally disproportionate to any grown man's expectation.
''I was sickened and yet they played well that year. You'd love to have
a Scottish team like that today. By the time Argentina came I was cured.
''I converted to may the best team win. If it was my team that was a
bonus. My problem was that there were getting less and less good games
of football in World Cups I've been to. The last one was a fucking
travesty. The final was a game I would have walked out of if it had been
at Cappielow.''
Sharp would settle for a Scottish team which doesn't win the World Cup
but will ''play characteristically well in an over-ornate style, an
embellished way of playing the game which is not efficient but is awfy
nice to watch. More than entertaining, aesthetically brave. To play the
backheel when it would better to kill the ball and push it to the side.
Or hit the through ball that leaves the defender like a quadraplegic. If
they ever played a whole game like that it would be incredible, but I'm
looking even for a 25-minute spell in the middle. OK if they then say we
were only kidding, you can beat us now.''
Before we enter into more personal territories such as life, love,
sex, drugs, drink, and literature it is useful to have a quick resume of
the life of Alan Sharp.
So, meanwhile, back at the nursing home in Alyth in 1934 where Ethel
Foot has given birth to a son. It is not certain whether the father,
Peter Craig, back in Dundee even knows about the situation.
The baby is adopted at six weeks by Joe and Meg Sharp, working-class
Salvation Army people from the Wee Dublin area of Greenock. If Alan
Sharp took in his socialism at birth, it was his Greenock upbringing
that gave him his way with words.
''Joe Sharp was a profoundly religious man, a Christian man with all
the limitations that brings. With a bit more education I'm sure he would
have become a minister. The Salvation Army was a more cheerful
fundamentalism than, for instance, the Wee Frees.''
Joe Sharp had a penchant for the high-blown phrase, as used in the
Salvation Army process of giving testimony and reciting homilies; the
wee tales which Sharp describes as his basic craft. But also the
aphorisms and lore of working-class Greenock. Young Alan remembers Joe
being ticked off by Meg for missing the odd corner when he was
distempering the walls. ''Och, a blind man on a galloping horse wouldn't
know the difference,'' was the reply. Sharp used the line in his western
Billy Two Hats. He has tried since to introduce it, usually
unsuccessfully, into other bits of screenwriting. It now resurfaces as
the title of his latest book, a rites of passage tale of adolescent life
in 1944 Greenock. (A Blind Man On A Galloping Horse should be published,
all going well, in autumn 1993 -- the first Alan Sharp book in 25
years.)
As a young man Sharp worked as a tradesman in the shipyards and as a
labourer in IBM. He was going nowhere slowly. At the age of 15 he quit
his apprenticeship as a joiner in the yards to be a trainee private eye
after seeing a small ad in the Greenock Telegraph. He thought he was
going to be Philip Marlowe. The job was as a debt collector. He was back
in the yards as a hole-borer within a week.
Then he discovered education and literature through the teachers'
training scheme which sent him to the yooni and gave him ideas about
literature and a realisation of his own talents as a writer. With #500
in his pocket he wanted to take his wife from Greenock to Spain where,
in the late 1950s, they could live cheaply and he could be Ernest
Hemingway and run with the bulls in Pamplona.
His wife wouldn't go. He gave her the money and left her to find a new
life in London, where in the fullness of time he became a writer. The
rest of his story is well-charted.
He takes his success as a novelist and then as a screenwriter in
Holloywood in a matter of fact way. ''I'm a talented writer. Not one
who's ploughing a bizarre and esoteric furrow but a mainstream writer. I
enjoy writing. I just sit down and get on with the tale.'' Or to be
accurate he used to stand up and get on with the tale. He had an old
stand-up desk at which he worked, hand-writing his stories and scripts
into bound ledgers. Later in life, at the grand old age of 58, he says
he prefers to sit down in a comfortable chair with his ledger in his
lap. ''It's so much easier to fall asleep that way.''
Sharp does not conform to the heavy-bevvy stereotype of your Scottish
writer. ''I was never a drinker. I drank as part of the rites of
passage.
''I might have been drunk twice in the last few years. I find women a
much bigger drug, much more stimulating. Women are the greatest drug of
all time; all things are possible.''
Sharp describes his personal relationships as chaotic. Three wives,
affairs, love children. He is amazingly frank and open about his
personal life.
After a career as a serial seducer of women, he is now what you might
call a recovering seducer. But when you're a seducer of women, he says,
you have to be a placator of women, making up for the lies that are
inevitably involved.
''I've only just broken out of that vicious spiral by the simple and
old-fashioned thing of stopping fucking around. If you stop you don't
have to placate anymore.
''I still look at women the same way but I know that it will all end
up in the same place. You can start anywhere you like and go through the
romance and the excitement and the passion, the up the close part of it.
But at the end of the day they'll be looking at you and saying 'But you
said . . . ' and you'll say 'What I really meant was . . . ' and you're
back where you were, so you might as well not start. This isn't wisdom
or anything, it's just weariness.''
He lives on the paradise island of Kawau, New Zealand, with Harriet
Hall, a black woman from Detroit. ''She's been very helpful to me. She
relentlessly called me on my lies, a bit like aversion therapy, until as
I sit here there are no more lies.''
One of his remaining addictions is spending a lot of cash on mobility
between the different strands of his life in New Zealand, Los Angeles,
London and Scotland.
He left Los Angeles for New Zealand in 1980. He didn't want to live in
Ronald Reagan's America. He wasn't ready to come back to Scotland,
didn't fancy Canada or Australia and settled on the provincial fastness
of New Zealand.
Sharp has taken to sailing in wee boats. Exposed as he was to the
seascape of Greenock as a boy and young man, he never went sailing. That
was not for the working classes.
In New Zealand it's different, a common hobby like golf is over here.
He has an iron-hulled dinghy in which he potters around the Bounty Bar
surroundings of the island.
''I've enjoyed learning something new late in life. If I have an
aspiration, apart from Scotland winning the World Cup, I would like to
sail to Greenock. It would be a long journey and I would need a boat
that would allow me to make mistakes but it can be done.''
The old man and the sea. Alan Sharp, still chasing Hemingway after all
these years.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article