MICHAEL GRADE, chief executive of Channel 4, last night championed the
cause of the BBC as a standard-setter for the rest of the industry and
at the same time launched a blistering attack on the present hierarchy
of the corporation. He described John Birt, Director General-designate
as being like a Trappist monk, and the present incumbent of that post,
Michael Checkland, as a lame duck.
Delivering the keynote James MacTaggart Lecture at the launch of the
Edinburgh International Television Festival, Mr Grade, himself once a
candidate for the DG job, said:
''I hope that everyone here will agree that it is not too late to
begin an open and aggressive campaign to ensure that the BBC doesn't
just survive as a shadow of its former self, but moves confidently into
the next century still able to do what it does best -- giving the whole
of the British public the best radio and television service in the
world.''
Mr Grade claimed that BBC staff used to say that ITV might be rich but
the BBC were bold. ''But in recent years that boldness has been replaced
by an enervating caution which starts at the top and quickly becomes the
culture of the whole organisation.''
The BBC's timidity was, perhaps, understandable when it was remembered
the terrible battering it had taken from the Thatcher Government and its
supporters over the last ten years or so.
It was perhaps significant that while Mr Grade was on this annual
platform for the industry speaking in support of the BBC and the
continuance of a licence fee, the corporation's most senior management
were not present.
''Present editorial policies are subject to death by a thousand
whispers,'' he said. ''Creative talents can no longer look to the top of
the BBC for support when they most need it.''
He said that Mr Checkland was originally appointed by a board chaired
by the present chairman (Marmaduke Hussey) and he won the job against a
field ''of Jeremy Isaacs, David Dimbleby, Brian Wenham, Anthony Smith
and myself.
'' We all had a very fair chance to offer our vision to the governors
who then made their choice.''
'' This time, however, it had been decided to deal with Michael
Checkland's future and the succession at a private dinner where the
chairman insisted on the early appointment of John Birt. No board, no
interviews, no manifestos. ''Other potential and well qualified
candidates, particularly inside, were ignored,'' said Mr Grade. ''This
raises the question of whether an issue of such magnitude should have
been decided over port and cigars.
''And what so-called business would ever have found itself at a
crucial time in its history with virtually two chief executives for
eighteen months -- the one a lame duck, the other a Trappist monk unable
to speak in public. How do the staff know who they are working for?''
Later Mr Howell James, BBC director of corporate affairs, said:
''Michael Grade caricatures some of the ideas that have been discussed
without properly considering the arguments behind them and seemingly
offers only that the BBC should respond to change by staying the same.
''The Royal Charter does not expire until the end of 1996. This autumn
the Government will issue its Green Paper and the BBC will publish a
very full and detailed document setting out its case.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article