WORLD boxing champion Chris Eubank was yesterday fined #250 with #1450
costs for driving without due care and attention in an accident in which
a man was killed.
Eubank apologised in court to the family of the man who died when the
boxer's Range Rover left the road and crashed into a building site.
At the end of his evidence he said he had not spoken to anyone about
the tragedy and that this could be construed as being callous. ''That is
not so,'' declared Eubank, 26.
''All I can do is apologise now, and I will do so after I leave this
court, no matter what happens as to the verdict.''
But last night an uncle of crash victim Kevin Lawlor denounced the
fighter's apology as insincere and six months too late.
Outside Haywards Heath Magistrates Court in West Sussex, Mr John
Smith, 46, described the #250 fine as ''like a drop in the ocean'', and
said Mr Lawlor's mother would never forgive Eubank ''since behaving the
way he has behaved and conducted himself following Kevin's death''.
He said Eubank appeared to be insensitive, to lack dignity, to be
insincere, arrogant, self-opinionated, and superficial.
Mr Lawlor had been mown down because of Eubank's carelessness, said Mr
Smith. ''He tries to project the image of a deep-thinking, articulate
gentleman, but fails miserably.''
Eubank, who denied driving carelessly, was found guilty by
magistrates. His licence was endorsed with six penalty points.
Later, before being driven away from the court, Eubank said: ''This
has been a tragic accident. I want to say sorry publicly to the family.
I have been advised for the last six months not to say anything
publicly. All I can say is my thoughts and sympathies are with Mr
Lawlor's family.''
In his courtroom apology the World Boxing Organisation
super-middleweight champion turned towards relatives of 33-year-old
building worker Mr Lawlor and said he had wanted to pay his respects,
but it had not been possible.
Eubank, of Hove, East Sussex, was said by his counsel, Mr Richard
Benson, to have been deeply unhappy at what had happened in the accident
last February, when his car left the A23 London-Brighton road and hit Mr
Lawlor.
Mr Benson said Eubank had been under great emotional strain, and had
felt frustrated because he had had to wait so long to be able to express
his feelings publicly.
The boxer had been worried that elements of the community might have
regarded him as being somewhat callous and cold about what had happened.
''He urges me to emphasise it would be quite wrong to form that view,''
said counsel. ''He is deeply unhappy at what happened, and felt
frustrated at being unable to express these sentiments.''
The chairman of the magistrates, Mr Tom Craig, said he was sure people
would have valued what Eubank had said.
The chairman said the case had attracted a great deal of publicity. It
was clear whatever punishment was imposed Eubank had already been
affected by the tragic results of his carelessness, and whatever
sentence was passed would not compensate Mr Lawlor's family for his
loss.
''Our sentence in any case is not meant in any way to place a value on
Mr Lawlor's life.''
The court heard the tragedy happened as Eubank and his two brothers
were driving to Gatwick aiport to fly to see their grandmothers in
Jamaica.
Miss Maria Higgins, prosecuting, said that although he had been
driving within the speed limit he should have been travelling much
slower and had been unable to control the vehicle.
PC David Dudley said that in an interview after the accident Eubank
said he had thought there was grit or pebbles on the road, and he
touched the brakes, which caused the car to swerve from side to side and
eventually leave the road.
He told police he had been travelling at 58mph and had thought he
should slow down. He thought the vehicle's power steering had
contributed to the swaying, because it was light.
Evidence was given that the nearside tyres of the vehicle deflated in
the accident. Pressures in the offside tyres were 46 lbs at the front
and 54 lbs at the rear. The recommended pressures were 28 at the front
and 35 at the rear.
Forensic scientist David Price said he would not expect this to have
any effect on the handling of the car.
Eubank, smartly dressed in a blue suit, described himself as a
pugilist.
He told the court he regularly checked the tyre pressures, putting 35
lbs in each tyre.
On the day of the accident he had not experienced difficulty in
handling the vehicle before it began to swerve.
He had thought he would slow down slightly and had touched the brakes,
sensing there was gravel on the road.
Once the vehicle started to sway it was difficult to regain control,
he told the magistrates.
As it went off the road, ''I saw this fellow there, and I couldn't do
anything''.
Eubank said he had not been wearing a seat belt but he had both hands
on the steering wheel and had been concentrating on the journey. He had
not been driving without care.
Asked why he had been in the outside lane of the dual carriageway he
said: ''You have two lanes. It was my choice''.
In cross-examination he was asked why he had not seen a Rolls-Royce
which the court heard was following him.
He said: ''I have had 32 fights. I walk into the arena where there are
thousands of people usually booing me. I hear them, but it does not
register, it does not make an imprint on my mind.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article