IAN Durrant's contract at Ibrox expires at the end of the season and
there is no guarantee he will be given the chance to stay on. Yet if
Rangers decide he should continue his career elsewhere -- and it would
be their decision not his -- it would be a great pity.
The 28-year-old has been at Ibrox since he was a teenager and would
prefer nothing better than to end his playing days there, but Rangers
might not be so anxious to extend the relationship. Indeed, they may
believe they have done enough for the player already and that no-one
could accuse them of being disloyal should they now be of a mind to
sever ties.
Walter Smith is trying to reshape his side and blend a collection of
talents capable of winning at home and also of competing in the
Champions' League. As manager, that is precisely what he should be
doing, and inevitably some difficult decisions will have to be made.
Egos will be deflated. There will be casualties.
Interestingly, however, the one time Rangers performed impressively in
the Champions' League, in season 1992-93, when they went through their
qualifying games and group matches unbeaten and almost made it to the
final against AC Milan, Durrant was one of the heroes. In fact, during
that run alone he paid back any kindness shown to him by his emplpoyers.
The midfield player scored three Champions' League goals and it was
his astute use of the ball and ability to make telling runs which helped
make Rangers such a force throughout that campaign, one of the most
exciting recent times in Scottish football. So far as I can see, nothing
much has changed with Durrant, yet he is unable to command a regular
first-team place with Rangers.
Smith uses the running and tackling power of Stuart McCall, whose
tenacity often disguises the fact that he, too, is a decent distributor
of the ball, and with the emergence of Craig Moore and Charlie Miller,
both of whom are versatile and play midfield as one of their positions,
Durrant must be standing on the sidelines wondering two things. First,
he must be asking himself if it would not be better to leave, and
secondly he may be considering if either Moore or Miller will ever have
his touch and vision.
However, the threat to Durrant is not so much from younger stock as
from players like McCall and Ian Ferguson, who is fit again. Trevor
Steven and Alexei Mikhailichenko are recovering from long-term injuries
and then there is Brian Laudrup, a player to whom even Durrant would
bend a knee.
Gordon Durie has also been used in wide midfield, all of which tends
to suggest Durrant is being pushed further out of the manager's grand
scheme. Durrant could be looking at a term in reserve-team football and
that really would be a dreadful waste of what is still a rare talent.
The truth is Durrant is much too good to play in anyone's second team,
and if he has not already told his manager so, then it is about time he
did.
It is not this column's place to champion anarchy within Ibrox, or any
other club for that matter, but there has to be something seriously
wrong with all of us -- at the very least too many seasons of
bludgeoning premier division football must have warped our values -- if
a player like Durrant is left to kick his heels in the little leagues.
Are we really so well off for talented footballers that someone like
him can be passed over? Of course we aren't.
Smith obviously feels he has enough in midfield and would have
accepted a realistic offer from Everton had the English premiership side
been willing to extend Durrant's recent loan period at Goodison Park to
a more permanent signing. It is indeed a desperate stage we have reached
if most of the above players are considered to be in possession of
greater touch and wider appreciation of what goes on during 90 minutes
than Durrant, even if he did suffer horribly because of injury. Yes, I
know that to keep harping on about the tackle which almost completely
destroyed one of his knees is tedious, but had that not happened,
Durrant would probably have been the most influential player in
Scotland's midfield by now, never mind a club side.
He never did quite recover his electrifying burst of pace which often
propelled him through opposing lines of defence and into scoring
positions. He was one of the few players in the Scottish game who could
do that and even though he was brought more into line with everyone else
after his knee had been rebuilt, he still found he could pass with
greater accuracy and see openings quicker than the others.
Those qualities alone make him someone to be cherished, a player to be
protected. He is certainly not someone who should be discarded.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article