Paul Hunter was crowned Masters champion for a third time in four years last night after a breathtaking final against Ronnie O'Sullivan.
The 25-year-old Yorkshireman defeated the Rocket 10-9 at Wembley Conference Centre after a superb match in which O'Sullivan had looked home and dry.
Hunter deserved every penny of his (pounds) 100,00 pay cheque for snatching victory from the jaws of defeat when O'Sullivan led 6-1, 7-2 and 9-8.
With his blond Beckhamesque hairstyle, the Leeds lad certainly potted some
golden balls to win snooker's most prestigious invitation event.
He knocked in five centuries during a sensational contest, one more than he managed against Fergal O'Brien when fighting back from 6-2 down against the Dubliner in the 2001 final.
In 2002, Hunter was 5-0 behind against Mark Williams but again stormed back to take the title 10-9.
However, this match even eclipsed those two thrilling encounters. Fiancee Lyndsey Fell was quickly into the arena to plant a kiss on the new champion's cheek.
''You are going to ask me about Plan B, aren't you,'' grinned Hunter, who first used the magic formula against O'Brien.
''Lyndsey is good at what she does,'' added the cheeky world No.8, who indulged in some interval intimacy to revive his flagging fortunes.
''Ronnie played well in the afternoon and I didn't do too badly with a couple of centuries. But tonight it all clicked.''
O'Sullivan tried his best to keep Hunter at bay in the near five-hour contest. But even the world No.3 couldn't hold back the tide.
It was a remarkable effort by Hunter who compiled breaks of 117, 102, 109, 110 and 127. He also added further runs of 82 and 58 plus a vital 36 in the final frame of the night.
O'Sullivan produced his best moments in the afternoon when he fired in runs of 56, 80, 86, 87, 84 and 79.
In contrast his highest effort of the second session was a modest 41. However, he did take the (pounds) 10,000 high break prize for his 138 against Jimmy White in Saturday's semi-finals.
There was also a (pounds) 50,000 runners-up consolation prize.
''I've only lost a snooker match, I could be in Iraq,'' said O'Sullivan, whose defeat will revive bad memories of 1997 when he led Steve Davis 8-4 but ended up losing 10-8.
''Life goes on. In sport it would be great if there were two winners sitting here with the trophy. But there has to be one winner and one loser and tonight Paul is the winner.''
Hunter had beaten Scotland's John Higgins 6-3 to reach the final on Saturday night, a match which ended with Higgins launching a verbal assault on the sport's governing body, so displeased was he with the state of the tables at Wembley.
Hunter, in contrast, had no problems with the surface. ''I thought it was fine,'' he said. ''People have complained about it, but I just tried to stop thinking about it.
''I thought it was a good match, and I could have won
6-2.''
Higgins saw things quite differently. ''It was torture out there,'' said the Scot. ''We were playing with a light white, and the cushions were an absolute joke. I just couldn't get hold of the cue ball, and we shouldn't have to play on that. The table was a disgrace. Top players are not used to it.
''I've asked for something to be done. It's a sad day for snooker when no-one listens to the players. But it's not sour grapes. It would have been a travesty had I won that match.''
After many complaints earlier in the week, the table was re-covered before the quarter-finals. But the problems were not eradicated. Cloth manufacturers Milliken said: ''We conclude that conditions are about as perfect as they could be for the cloth.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article