John Swinney, the SNP leader, came under fresh attack yesterday from one of his own back benchers, who said Alex Neil would have been a better leader.
The criticism came from Campbell Martin, who backed little-known activist Bill Wilson's attempt last year to oust Mr Swinney.
''I'm not the first person to say that I have doubts about John's charisma or his ability to inspire people,'' said Mr Martin, who went on to praise SSP leader Tommy Sheridan as ''a charismatic figure in Scottish politics''.
His comments came in an interview with Holyrood magazine where Mr Martin, MSP for West of Scotland, accused the party, under the leadership first of Alex Salmond and then John Swinney, of losing touch with the public mood.
''The party began to move to the right under Alex Salmond,'' he said. ''I wish we were more to the left that we are are the moment. For the SNP to succeed we need to be more in touch with the people of Scotland, who are left-of-centre.''
Mr Martin made no attempt to hide his dissatisfaction with Mr Swinney and did nothing to dispel expectations that any SNP failure to perform well at the European elections will lead to fresh questioning of Mr Swinney's gradualist strategy.
''I think that any leader of a political party would look at the performances of the party under their leadership and ask themselves questions,'' said Mr Martin.
And he paid tribute to Alex Neil, who was defeated by John Swinney in the leadership battle triggered by Alex Salmond's decision to stand down in 2000.
''I think we'd be more in touch with the people of Scotland,'' he said.
''We should be arguing about the level of jobs, health, and education - the things that really matter to people.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article