WARTIME HEROES, as every tabloid headline writer knows, are a breed apart. Judging from RC Sherriff's 1929 play, based on his own experiences in the trenches during the First World War, its author clearly recognised such notions as a double-edged sword.
Set 50 yards from the front line, a symbolic No Man's Land between death and glory becomes an outpost of Old England kept alive by an officer class fully aware of how fragile the social pecking order can be. Into this outpost comes Raleigh, eyes wide with tales of derring-do and a little bit in love with Captain Stanhope, a real-life Boy's Own adventurer, three years his senior at school and now in charge of the post. For Stanhope, though, such is the price of heroism that the spoils of war have left him hollow and numb to the fear and loathing required to get by.
This is an unremittingly bleak affair, and you can see why Howard Barker's 1970s big-screen adaptation, Aces High, went airborne. For all the play's stiff-upper-lipped pukkaness, however, Sherriff's language sounds grittily fresh in David Grindley's darkly claustrophobic production.
With a steely ensemble cast led by Tom Wisdom as Stanhope and Richard Glaves as Raleigh, this is as much the latter's rites of passage as it is commentary on the futility of war. Reeking as it does too with the tuckbox bravado and homo-erotic repression of an all-boys public school, it's a timely reminder of the prevailing iniquities of the British class system, where weaklings are bullied while others take up arms and make sacrifice for king - or queen - and country.
The final image here, of bombs falling in black-out, is a living monument to life during wartime beyond the action-man image that guards some still-imagined dream of empires long since past.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article