THE volume of Dunblane papers released yesterday is vast. Even the index to the material, officially recorded by the National Archives of Scotland as the COM21/4 series, runs to several hundred pages.
In total, more than 3000 items occupying more than 15ft of shelf space have now been opened to the public at West Register House in Edinburgh.
All the material was submitted to Lord Cullen's inquiry into the massacre of March 13, 1996.
It includes hundreds of witness statements, letters to and from Thomas Hamilton, police intelligence reports and records of Hamilton's firearms, as well as psychological, financial and autopsy reports.
Some of the most moving items are statements from teachers who tried and failed to save the lives of gravely wounded children at Dunblane Primary after Hamilton had shot them.
The files were originally marked as "closed" for 100 years, with Lord Cullen's approval, in order to protect children mentioned in relation to Hamilton's previous suspicious behaviour.
However, the extraordinary step fuelled a host of conspiracy theories that Hamilton had been spared prosecution and allowed to keep firearms because of friends in high places, possibly as part of a paedophile ring.
In 2003, ministers told the lord advocate to make the files public, ending the controversy.
During the following two years, the documents were edited by the Crown Office to remove the names of witnesses, children, and officials. What is left manages to dispel the conspiracy theories, but still manages to paint a depressing picture of how Hamilton evaded justice until he belatedly shot himself.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article