THE boyfriend of Jodi Jones was identified in court yesterday as looking like a youth seen near the woods where the schoolgirl's body was found, and looking as though he had been ''up to no good''.
Lorraine Fleming told the High Court in Edinburgh she had seen a youth resembling Luke Mitchell standing at a gate opposite the entrance to Roan's Dyke path, where Jodi's body was found on June 30 last year.
When asked if the person she had seen was in court, Mrs Fleming, 46, told advocate-depute Alan Turnbull, QC, he was ''in the front row there'', pointing towards Mr Mitchell.
The court was told Mrs Fleming was being driven to a supermarket that day by Rosemary Walsh, her partner's sister. As they drove from her Newtongrange home along Newbattle Road, she saw someone at a gate at around 5.40pm or 5.50pm, less than an hour after Jodi was last seen.
She said: ''He was facing me. As he came into view I turned round and said to Rosemary: 'He looks as if he has been up to no good'.''
Asked to explain, she said: ''It was just the way he was standing. He wasn't looking as if he was waiting on anyone. His face - he was watching the ground, the pavement, constantly.''
Mrs Fleming said she thought he was wearing dark clothing, a long, dark green jacket, and was aged about 17.
Donald Findlay, QC, for Mr Mitchell, questioning Mrs Fleming on the youth's behaviour, said: ''He was doing nothing that was in any way wrong, menacing, threatening or distressing, is that correct?''
Mrs Fleming: ''Yes.''
She added: ''It just didn't look right. I am sorry, but it didn't.''
Mr Mitchell denies murdering Jodi and has lodged defences of alibi and incrimination.
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article