IT is always a pleasure to flush out a Scottish apologist for New Labour, especially as their arguments almost invariably seal the case for the opposition.
John S Rosie (May 11) tells us that it is a facility in Petten, Belgium which produces cancer-treating material and not Dounreay. This is quite contrary to the yarn being spun by Brian Wilson, Robin Cook, etc, who would have us believe that weapons grade uranium is smuggled into one end of the Caithness plant and cancer-treating material pops out of the other.
Of course, what Mr Rosie conveniently omits to mention is that there is so much of this stuff available that the production of any more is completely superfluous. Which is just as well, given the complete inability of Dounreay to produce anything at the moment except massive pollution and the real possibility of a reactor meltdown.
The facts are simple. This Government made a secret deal to transport nuclear material to Dounreay. The secrecy was vital because Dounreay does not even have a safety certificate and can do nothing with it.
They were forced to admit to the deal by the New York Times. They tried to deflect criticism by telling the public that ''they should be proud'' to accept this material because Dounreay could ''turn it into cancer-treating isotopes''. By Mr Rosie's own admission, even if the plant were operational, it cannot.
The decision to send any nuclear material to Dounreay defies logic. No amount of party political propaganda can obscure that fact. Mr Rosie does not want the yarn spinners running his country. The latest opinion polls point to his wish being granted!
Stuart Morrison,
2467 Dumbarton Road,
Glasgow.
May 11.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article